Hi,
I am running puppet on my machines (mainly all rhel 5) and notice that
puppet is waking the CPU up between 90 - 100 times a second.
Is this normal?? it is waking the CPU up more than the kernel itself (when
not under load)!!
All puppet instances run as a daemon. Just as a test I also get the
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> 0.25.5 changed the default vardir from /var/puppet to /var/lib/puppet
> and it's caused the odd issue we have to fix in the Mac pkg
> preflights.
>
> After re-reading 'man hier' I'm tempted to change the default on OS X to:
>
> /var/db/puppet
>
> inste
On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:02 AM, Nat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running puppet on my machines (mainly all rhel 5) and notice that puppet
> is waking the CPU up between 90 - 100 times a second.
>
> Is this normal?? it is waking the CPU up more than the kernel itself (when
> not under load)!!
>
> Al
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 17:02 +1000, Nat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running puppet on my machines (mainly all rhel 5) and notice that
> puppet is waking the CPU up between 90 - 100 times a second.
>
> Is this normal?? it is waking the CPU up more than the kernel itself
> (when not under load)!!
>
Hi Jesse,
Thanks for the reply and shading a light on this...
-Fernand
On Jun 8, 3:42 pm, Jesse Wolfe wrote:
> Short answer: we intend to support ruby 1.9, and some work is being done.
> The next major release (Rowlf a.k.a 2.6.0) will probably not be 1.9 ready,
> but the release after that s
> See, for
> instancehttp://www.puppetmanaged.org/documentation/Puppet_Common_Modules.htmlhttp://www.example42.com/puppet/howto.phphttp://plathrop.tertiusfamily.net/blog/2008/04/18/creating-puppet-mod...http://serialized.net/2009/07/puppet-module-patterns/
>
> Thus, the approach for customizing e
Thanks for responses everyone. It's fine now. Using the subdir was
hurting me, i.g, RailsBaseURI /foreman, as I couldn't put it in the
url field of foreman.rb. Now that I took it off, all needed to do was
to redirect the url to https://host:443. It works fine now.
Cheers,
Henry
On Jun 9, 8:22
Hi, after filing a bug report and patch, how should I proceed?
The report now has Status: Unreviewed and Votes: 1. Is this group the
right place to discuss a filed issue and get those values changed?
Regards,
Robert.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
I have the same issue as well, seems puppetqd uses sqlite for caching?
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Jason Koppe wrote:
> Queuing support from ActiveMQ doesn't even make a difference for me -- I
> thought the purpose of adding the queuing support was to queue the data in
> puppetqd's memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
> Hi, after filing a bug report and patch, how should I proceed?
> The report now has Status: Unreviewed and Votes: 1. Is this group the
> right place to discuss a filed issue and get those values changed?
Somebody neds to look at the bugreport an
Robert Scheer wrote:
> Hi, after filing a bug report and patch, how should I proceed?
> The report now has Status: Unreviewed and Votes: 1. Is this group the
> right place to discuss a filed issue and get those values changed?
Also - what's the ticket? Sharing the URL here helps too. :)
Regards
I'm not sure, I can't seem to find README.queuing or much documentation
about how it's supposed to work. I'll checkout the code this weekend if
there aren't responses here.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Christopher Johnston wrote:
> I have the same issue as well, seems puppetqd uses sqlite fo
HI David,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:53 PM, wrote:
> I have my sudoers setup as per the puppet training class recommendation:
>
>file { "/etc/sudoers.check":
>content => template("etc/sudoers.erb"),
>mode => 440,
>notify => Exec['sudo-check
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:53 PM, wrote:
> I have my sudoers setup as per the puppet training class recommendation:
>
>file { "/etc/sudoers.check":
>content => template("etc/sudoers.erb"),
>mode => 440,
>notify => Exec['sudo-check'],
>
We have a server where the OS and base services are managed by an
external company. They use puppet to handle this.
We would also like to use puppet to manage the configuration of the
server for which we are responsible, mostly apache virtual hosts.
Is it possible to get the puppetd process to us
I have my sudoers setup as per the puppet training class recommendation:
file { "/etc/sudoers.check":
content => template("etc/sudoers.erb"),
mode => 440,
notify => Exec['sudo-check'],
}
exec { 'sudo-check':
p
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Mark wrote:
> We have a server where the OS and base services are managed by an
> external company. They use puppet to handle this.
>
> We would also like to use puppet to manage the configuration of the
> server for which we are responsible, mostly apache virtual
17 matches
Mail list logo
