FWIW -
I currently see this error on around 30% of our EC2 nodes since moving
to 0.25. We also use the rpm's provided for both client and master.
The fix is for us to log on to the EC2 node, remove the cert, run a
puppetca --clean on the master for the hostname, and then start puppet
again on th
Hi,
Is there a way to increase the timeout settings in puppet when it comes
to downloading huge file, Im talking of a 1.7GB file being downloaded
using wget in a puppet manifest.
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi,
[puppetd] is for the puppet process that runs on every puppet node.
[puppetmasterd] is for the puppet master process.
What is the issue with getting the client and server talking? What happens?
J.
2009/10/14 Douglas Garstang :
>
> I'm getting really really frustrated with puppet.
>
> Why
exec { "foo":
command => "wget http://foo/bar.tgz";,
timeout => 0;
}
The type reference documentation describes the timeout parameter.
On Oct 14, 2009, at 5:45 AM, pinoyskull wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to increase the timeout settings in puppet when it
> comes
> to downloadi
If it's in an exec:
timeout => -1
Trevor
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 06:44, pinoyskull wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to increase the timeout settings in puppet when it comes
> to downloading huge file, Im talking of a 1.7GB file being downloaded
> using wget in a puppet manifest.
>
> Thanks.
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
>
> I'm getting really really frustrated with puppet.
>
> Why is it that when I install the puppet-server RPM, my default config
> file in /etc/puppet/puppet.conf has a [puppetd] section and not a
> [puppetmasterd] section? Isn't that what
Can anyone in the know please help to clear this up?
Does puppetmaster look for [puppetd] or [puppetmasterd] in
/etc/puppet/puppet.conf ???
Doug.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Douglas Garstang
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm getting really reall
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
>
> Can anyone in the know please help to clear this up?
>
> Does puppetmaster look for [puppetd] or [puppetmasterd] in
> /etc/puppet/puppet.conf ???
[puppetmasterd] I believe. That's what I always use on my servers.
>
> Doug.
>
> On We
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Douglas Garstang
> wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone in the know please help to clear this up?
>>
>> Does puppetmaster look for [puppetd] or [puppetmasterd] in
>> /etc/puppet/puppet.conf ???
>
> [puppetmasterd] I be
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Douglas Garstang
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can anyone in the know please help to clear this up?
>>>
>>> Does puppetmaster look for [puppetd] or [pupp
Good Afternoon, all,
I believe I posted something on this in the past, but didn't get many
replies.
I'm trying to manage some slightly different configs for different
classes of hosts within templates using
scope.compiler.classlist.include. Specifically, for example, all of our
hosts have the sa
Hi,
can anyone using facts verify that what I'm doing should be correct ?
On Oct 13, 2009, at 8:13 PM, desdic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to make facts work via modules (According to
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PluginsInModules) but its
> simply not working. I have bee
For what it's worth, I've been having a heck of a time getting
puppetmaster and puppet to communicate over the last few days. I just
went back to puppet 0.24.8 and it worked on the _very_ first attempt.
In both instances the config files were generated from genconf.
Methinks 0.25 is broken in some
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Kim Gert Nielsen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can anyone using facts verify that what I'm doing should be correct ?
Does this shed light on things?
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMultipleEnvironments
scroll to: "Plugins and Facts"
>
> On Oct 13, 2009
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Douglas Garstang
>> wrote:
>>> Can anyone in the know please help to clear this up?
>>>
>>> Does puppetmaster look for [puppetd] or [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt wrote:
> FWIW -
>
> I currently see this error on around 30% of our EC2 nodes since moving
> to 0.25. We also use the rpm's provided for both client and master.
> The fix is for us to log on to the EC2 node, remove the cert, run a
> puppetca --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> For what it's worth, I've been having a heck of a time getting
> puppetmaster and puppet to communicate over the last few days. I just
> went back to puppet 0.24.8 and it worked on the _very_ first attempt.
> In both instance
2009/10/14 James Turnbull :
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matt wrote:
>> FWIW -
>>
>> I currently see this error on around 30% of our EC2 nodes since moving
>> to 0.25. We also use the rpm's provided for both client and master.
>> The fix is for us to log on to the EC2 n
Can someone tell me what this means? I am getting this in
/var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log on the server.
[2009-10-14 15:07:35] DEBUG accept: 10.10.1.23:33626
[2009-10-14 15:07:35] ERROR `/production/certificate/ca' not found.
[2009-10-14 15:07:35] DEBUG close: 10.10.1.23:33626
This is with puppet
That's a weird one.
I'm assuming the other resources that are created for the fooClass get
created?
Possibly an issue with the scope lookup.
Is there an open issue in redmine?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Jason Antman wrote:
>
> Good Afternoon, all,
>
> I believe I posted something on
Yes, the other resources get created fine.
As far as I can find, no. I didn't want to open an issue until I got
some feedback from the community on whether or not anyone else has seen
this behavior (no need to open an issue for something that someone knows
was fixed).
If I don't get any more res
2009/10/14 Paul Lathrop :
> You misunderstand. Nigel and I are saying the generated config should
> be known to *work*; it shouldn't have genconfig set to true in it. It
> is counterintuitive for the output of --genconfig to be a config file
> that will not start up a puppetmasterd in "normal" mod
2009/10/14 Douglas Garstang :
>
> Please don't strip it out. The documentation is terrible and this at
> least gives me a known good working config.
>
Hi - please expand on the "Documentation is terrible" comment. :)
How can we improve it? What's wrong with it? Where are the areas
that you're
23 matches
Mail list logo
