I swear people who use Puppet are more fertile. Congratulations, Paul!
Julian.
2009/10/12 Nicolas Szalay :
> Le dimanche 11 octobre 2009 à 12:58 -0700, Paul Lathrop a écrit :
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> Well, I really was meaning to get this cleaned up and put on the wiki,
>> but the world seems to
Julian Simpson a écrit :
> I swear people who use Puppet are more fertile. Congratulations, Paul!
>
> Julian.
>
this is just that they do not let chaos do the job even in biology, all
is managed in a central repository secured by ssl certificates where the
family keeps his good practice sinc
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> Well, I really was meaning to get this cleaned up and put on the wiki,
> but the world seems to conspire against it. First couple of times I
> sat down to do it, I got Nagios pages. The last time was the real
> winner, th
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Luke Schierer wrote:
> I am trying to configure tagmail to send emails to different segments of
> the team based on the classes that are loaded. For the most part it seems
> to be working, but I'm having trouble with getting a rule that will send an
> email for eve
Hi.
II am trying puppet after cfengine and I am looking for a method to use a
class if a file exist.
exemple
I have a condition class.
I have to create on the server the condition class but i do not want to have
it execute on every client. It is not easy for me to set on the server the
condition
Hi all,
I am trying to cache data, which should be available to different
puppet clients and so far I am not successful. The cached data should
reside in a variable and not in a flat file. When the first
puppetclient connects to the puppetmaster, then the puppetmaster
generates the data dynamica
Sunil,
I read the thread.
The way Puppet works, it's going to compile a specific catalog for the
host making a requests with essentially a blank slate every time.
You could do something like extend Ohad's example and add a global
variable to the Ruby runtime that gets assigned the first time it
Julian Simpson writes:
> I swear people who use Puppet are more fertile. Congratulations, Paul!
Or at least using Puppet frees up time for side projects.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Use
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Jean Spirat wrote:
>
> Julian Simpson a écrit :
>> I swear people who use Puppet are more fertile. Congratulations, Paul!
>>
>> Julian.
>>
> this is just that they do not let chaos do the job even in biology, all
> is managed in a central repository secured by ss
On 12/10/09 12:42, Julian Simpson wrote:
>
> I swear people who use Puppet are more fertile. Congratulations, Paul!
>
There may be something in that - I have two sets of twins :)
Congrats Paul!
R.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Lathrop wrote:
> You guys crack me up. Thanks for all the good wishes!
>
> --Paul
Congrats +1!
node offspring inherits plathrop {
include littlebundleofjoy
include nosleep
include puppet
}
Cheers
James Turnbull
- --
Author of:
william Famy wrote:
> I prefer runing class on my client if thereis a file exemple if the
> file /etc/mypuppet/condition is present execute the condition class.
If you want to do this, you'll likely have to create a simple facter
fact for your clients so that the puppetmaster receives "true" if
Pete Emerson wrote:
> We've got over 150 hosts hitting the one puppetmaster, and based on
> what I've seen via searching it seems like we're hitting into
> scalability issues with Webrick, and the recommendation is to switch
> to Mongrel or Passenger. Looks to me like Passenger is where the focu
Carl, Nigel,
Thanks for working on this. It looks great and will be a valuable
addition.
Sorry for the late reply. I haven't been watching the lists closely
lately.
I agree that the name auth_membership is probably a poor choice since
auth and membership bring to mind other unrelated top
How about merge_exclusive? It shows we want to merge all known entries
in the defined dict/array, but also shows we exclusively want those
defined.
On Oct 12, 2009, at 10:58 PM, Crawford Kyle wrote:
> Carl, Nigel,
>
> Thanks for working on this. It looks great and will be a valuable
> add
You can technically do this with a custom fact as suggested.
if $myfact {
include specialsauce
}
The rational behind why you would want to avoid this in general is
simple, favor specificity.
Machines shouldn't have a file that then decides how something else
gets configured, you should tell
16 matches
Mail list logo
