On Jun 25, 9:03 am, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> It says it can't compile the catalog - this is _not_ a connection
> problem. Can you test without external nodes first?
Sorry, I mis-stated, I was aware it was connecting. However, I did
test without external nodes and it appears to work. Hmm,
My original email didn't explain my problem very well.
I'm just looking for a bit of advice on how to implement the
following;
How do I force my Service declaration (which is defined elsewhere and
inherited) to run after an exec has run?
ypbind is already defined as a service elsewhere so I inhe
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 02:20 -0700, Mike Lancaster wrote:
> My original email didn't explain my problem very well.
> I'm just looking for a bit of advice on how to implement the
> following;
>
> How do I force my Service declaration (which is defined elsewhere and
> inherited) to run after an exec
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:06 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>
> Bjørn Dyresen wrote:
>> On Jun 25, 2009, at 10:42 PM, Neil K wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am pretty new to Puppet. My puppet master server is a RHEL 5 box
>>> and
>>> puppet client is a CentOS 5.3 vm. I have managed to configure puppet
>
Greetings,
Lets say i have a module, 'centos_base'[1] which kinda bootstraps or
keeps a system to a certain standard. Packages, timezones, yum repos &
prios, snmp config, ssh_auth keys, stuff like that.
Now, i would like to make sure that if a node has this module, it should
always be execute
Hi!
I'm new to puppet and just testing it out.
I'm running SLES11 and puppet 0.24.8 from opensuse repos.
I've created a simple manifest to manage the large number of binary files –
quite a possible scenario for e.g. managing repository of software packages.
I see following messages coming into
Hello
Using the YUM provider/helper from 0.24.8 we have an issue with a
package latest all 3 packages are in the manifest as "latest":-
DBCF_4Q_LinuxAS4_DBCF_4Q_Linux_ins_DBCFStageLinux-5.03.1.0-5.03.1.0-0
DBCF_4Q_LinuxAS4_DBCF_4Q_Linux_ins_DBCFStageLinux-6.10.1.0-0- this
has an upgrade in t
Scott Smith writes:
> Mark Plaksin wrote:
>
>> Howdy:
>>
>> How does Passenger perform compared to Mongrel? For us Passenger looks
>> worse. We have two puppetmasters; one does file serving, the other does
>> everything else. We just started running 0.25 beta2 on both. The
>> file-server is
I want to replace the resolv.conf file on a client with a different
resolv.conf file staged on the puppetmaster.
I get this "could not find server my.server.name" error.
Though, if the resolv.conf file does not exist on the client, the file
is successfully added from the puppetmaster to the client
/usr/lib/ruby is a directory, not a symlink.
I wanted to make it easier to install, so I dropped the Factor and
Puppet packages into a Package Installer meta package. For whatever
reason, the meta package is causing the symlink to be replaced with a
directory. I will need to look at how I b
Let me answer that...
found in site.pp...filebucket option...
# The filebucket option allows for file backups to the server
filebucket { main: server => 'my.server.name' }
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
One culprit that I've seen repeatedly is the set of drivers for Sierra
Wireless Aircards, if that helps. Leopard and Tiger do indeed keep
ruby in separate locations and some installers don't honor that
difference correctly when they bundle it.
Jason
On Jun 25, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Nigel Kers
Hi all,
Best Practices Question: I've got Nagios configured via puppet, and (of
course) I want to monitor services. Where should I put the @@nagios_service
definitions? (example uses apache2)
a) In the apache2 module (high-coupling)
b) In the nagios module (doesn't make sense)
c) In some nagio
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Eric Gerlach wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Best Practices Question: I've got Nagios configured via puppet, and
> (of
> course) I want to monitor services. Where should I put the
> @@nagios_service
> definitions? (example uses apache2)
>
> a) In the apache2 module (hig
Some form of node classification tool -
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/CommonMisconceptions
It is mentioned here but I don't see any references to it in the wiki
anymore.
Did it die before fruition or does it now go by another name?
Dave M.
--~--~-~--~~~--
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Mark Plaksin wrote:
>
> Scott Smith writes:
>
>> Mark Plaksin wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy:
>>>
>>> How does Passenger perform compared to Mongrel? For us Passenger looks
>>> worse. We have two puppetmasters; one does file serving, the other does
>>> everything else. We
Mark Plaksin wrote:
> Sort of :) We run 12 masters in mongrel. Passenger doesn't seem have a
> "run at least this many puppetmasters" setting. We set the max to 12 to
> match mongrel but we never saw more than 6 masters running. We bumped
> max to 24 late yesterday and I now see 11 masters runn
It seems like the problem was caused by missing swap partition.
Everything started worked just fine once I added swap.
On Jun 26, 1:52 pm, Kirill Kuvaldin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to puppet and just testing it out.
>
> I'm running SLES11 and puppet 0.24.8 from opensuse repos.
>
> I've created a
Kirill Kuvaldin wrote:
> I've created a simple manifest to manage the large number of binary
> files – quite a possible scenario for e.g. managing repository of
> software packages.
>
Why are you using Puppet to perform a job that your OS can perform much
much easier with its bundled software
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Don wrote:
>
>> couple of nodes that need a different configuration. So what I need to do on
>> these particular nodes are, as far as I know, one of these things:
>> 1) Find a way to override the NTP configuration defined in the base node
>> 2) Make sure they don't
I just found the check box in Package Maker to follow symlinks. You
have to double click on each package to get at that preference. I
don't understand why it's not in the Configuration screen.
At any rate, my meta installer is now working. Thanks for the help.
BTW, I've started using Deep Fr
On Jun 26, 7:48 pm, Scott Smith wrote:
>
> Why are you using Puppet to perform a job that your OS can perform much
> much easier with its bundled software?
>
I think you got me wrong – I'm not going to manage software packages
via Puppet, I was just going to sync a large number of files across
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Allan Marcus wrote:
>
> I just found the check box in Package Maker to follow symlinks. You
> have to double click on each package to get at that preference. I
> don't understand why it's not in the Configuration screen.
>
> At any rate, my meta installer is now wo
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Jason Hueske wrote:
>
> One culprit that I've seen repeatedly is the set of drivers for Sierra
> Wireless Aircards, if that helps. Leopard and Tiger do indeed keep
> ruby in separate locations and some installers don't honor that
> difference correctly when they bu
Kirill Kuvaldin wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 26, 7:48 pm, Scott Smith wrote:
>> Why are you using Puppet to perform a job that your OS can perform much
>> much easier with its bundled software?
>>
>
> I think you got me wrong – I'm not going to manage software packages
> via Puppet, I was just going to
No, probably not. I was just being lazy and didn't want to push out
two packages.
Given that Facter and Puppet are different code branches that are not
dependent on each other (true?), then having seperate packages seems
fine.
BTW, are you going to post a new Facter package with the latest
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Allan Marcus wrote:
>
> No, probably not. I was just being lazy and didn't want to push out
> two packages.
>
> Given that Facter and Puppet are different code branches that are not
> dependent on each other (true?), then having seperate packages seems
> fine.
>
>
hello,
from what I understand, certs are assigned based on FQDN. We build all
our machines behind a NAT router and then when fully ready, we add the
machine to the main network, or might be used on a daily basis behind
a different NAT router - it all depends on the security requirements
o
yep, I knew that. But we pay Google a lot of money to keep the
distribution page updated!
Oh wait, we forgot to send the check. It's in the mail! Yep, check's
in the mail. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. :-)
---
Thanks,
Allan Marcus
505-667-5666
On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Nige
2009/6/26 Allan Marcus :
>
> hello,
>
> from what I understand, certs are assigned based on FQDN. We build all
> our machines behind a NAT router and then when fully ready, we add the
> machine to the main network, or might be used on a daily basis behind
> a different NAT router - it all depends
Scott Smith writes:
>> All of our puppetmasters are running on the same size hardware. The
>> machines have 8 cores and 12G of RAM.
>>
>> Do you expect Passenger to perform better?
>
> Not necessarily. But load average isn't exactly a great performance
> metric. BTW, what's the load average g
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Allan Marcus wrote:
>
> yep, I knew that. But we pay Google a lot of money to keep the
> distribution page updated!
>
> Oh wait, we forgot to send the check. It's in the mail! Yep, check's
> in the mail. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. :-)
check received,
On Jun 26, 3:05 pm, Mark Plaksin wrote:
> Scott Smith writes:
> > Mark Plaksin wrote:
> > Are you running the same # of mongrels as Passenger workers?
>
> Sort of :) We run 12 masters in mongrel. Passenger doesn't seem have a
> "run at least this many puppetmasters" setting. We set the max to
Christian Hofstaedtler writes:
> On Jun 26, 3:05 pm, Mark Plaksin wrote:
>
>> Scott Smith writes:
>> > Mark Plaksin wrote:
>> > Are you running the same # of mongrels as Passenger workers?
>>
>> Sort of :) We run 12 masters in mongrel. Passenger doesn't seem have a
>> "run at least this many
> Wrong place to do this, you do not use puppet to create a package. you
> sue puppet to install the package. The distribution you are using will
> dictate how to create packages. The ./configure, make, make install
> plus anything else needed for your particular package format would be
> done by
Mark Plaksin wrote:
> Load average is peaking around 10. That's not so good compared to
> running under mongrel where the load peaked at less than 5 (both with
> 0.25b1 and 0.25b2).
>
Were the puppetmasters verifiably slower? If so, how did you measure it?
-scott
--
sc...@ohlol.net
http://g
Scott Smith writes:
> Mark Plaksin wrote:
>
>> Load average is peaking around 10. That's not so good compared to
>> running under mongrel where the load peaked at less than 5 (both with
>> 0.25b1 and 0.25b2).
>
> Were the puppetmasters verifiably slower? If so, how did you measure it?
I didn't
>> done by you to create the application package. The package would then
>> be setup in a local repository and now puppet uses the appropraite
>> package manager to install you custom package.
>>
>> what distribution are you using?
>>
>> Evan
>
>
> My puppet master server is RHEL 5 and puppet cli
On Jun 26, 9:56 pm, Mark Plaksin wrote:
> Scott Smith writes:
> > Mark Plaksin wrote:
>
> >> Load average is peaking around 10. That's not so good compared to
> >> running under mongrel where the load peaked at less than 5 (both with
> >> 0.25b1 and 0.25b2).
>
> > Were the puppetmasters verif
Christian Hofstaedtler writes:
> On Jun 26, 9:56 pm, Mark Plaksin wrote:
>> Scott Smith writes:
>> > Mark Plaksin wrote:
>>
>> >> Load average is peaking around 10. That's not so good compared to
>> >> running under mongrel where the load peaked at less than 5 (both with
>> >> 0.25b1 and 0.25
hello,
maybe i missed it, but is the autosign.conf file documented anywhere?
If want to autosign all the computers in my domain, can I just put
*.lanl.gov
in the autosign.conf file?
---
Thanks,
Allan Marcus
505-667-5666
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received t
Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> What worries me is, that you are saying it takes twice as long and
> your load is twice as high. So you're actually seeing a 4-time worse
> performance, which is /very/ bad.
> Which processes do you see running? puppetmasterds and Apaches or only
> one kind of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allan Marcus wrote:
> hello,
>
> maybe i missed it, but is the autosign.conf file documented anywhere?
>
> If want to autosign all the computers in my domain, can I just put
>
> *.lanl.gov
>
Allan
See:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/
Hello guys,
I am facing this problem. I have an exec resource which has a create
parameter. The catalog runs properly but the file is not created, has anyone
faced such a problem?
My manifest is
class example
{
exec { "sources":
command => "/usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/gem sources -
Swati Tiwari wrote:
> The command runs fine but it does not create /tmp/githubadded file.
I think you're misunderstanding the parameter. The exec resource does
not create this file. It assumes whatever it is exec'ing will create the
file. So, it will keep running the exec until this file is cre
Swati Tiwari writes:
> Hello guys,
>
> I am facing this problem. I have an exec resource which has a create
> parameter. The catalog runs properly but the file is not created, has anyone
> faced such a problem?
> My manifest is
>
> class example
> {
> exec { "sources":
>
Swati Tiwari wrote:
> The command runs fine but it does not create /tmp/githubadded file. I
> also have write permission on this directory. Any help would be
> appreciated. Thanks!
>
<<
creates
A file that this command creates. If this parameter is provided, then
the command will only be run
Got it! Thank you!
I did this and it worked!
exec { "sources":
command => "sudo gem sources -a http://gems.github.com/ >
/tmp/githubadded",
creates => "/tmp/githubadded"
}
I hope that's the right way to do it...
2009/6/26 Scott Smith
>
> Swati Tiwari wrote:
> > The command runs
Scott Smith writes:
> Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
>> What worries me is, that you are saying it takes twice as long and
>> your load is twice as high. So you're actually seeing a 4-time worse
>> performance, which is /very/ bad.
>> Which processes do you see running? puppetmasterds and Apach
Thanks for all the pointers!
Currently I build all the files with a derivation of the
Apt_Repository recipe (http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/
Recipes/Apt_Repositories). So I would need to write these files to a
temp dir on the client and run concat on them.
Is there a way to concatena
Nigel, if you have similar scripts for flat or dmg pkgs I would love
to take a look. Does puppet's support such packages? Did you have any
trouble reconciling the different receipt mechanisms in 10.4/10.5?
On Jun 26, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> Please note that for both Puppet
51 matches
Mail list logo
