hi,
Yes, a script is the better wat to do that. I know the wiki, but i have some
difficulties to understand the docs (I don't read/write Easily english
language ;-) ), so, i try Puppet step vy step :
- I know how transfer a file,
- I can make little change on a files (rigth, owner ...),
- I can e
Hi,
I'll try this as sonn as possible. It seem powerful !
Thanks
Serge
2009/6/19 Trevor Vaughan
>
> Serge,
>
> If you want to do it this way, I would ditch the file type and do it
> all in an exec:
>
> define install_blender ( $version, $server ) {
> exec { "snarf_blender_$version":
>comm
Hi,
The systems (Ubuntu and Gentoo based) can support package, but, like I said
before, I try to learn Puppet and i explore it ;-)
The "problem" is that the systems are highly modified, and we need a tool
highly "scalable" to maintain our servers.
thanks for the piece of code, i'll tru it when i
Hello all.
I have just started to implement my first type and a parsed-file
provider for it.
It is called nfs_export and it should manage nfs-exports via /etc/
exports. First, here is the type:
http://pastie.org/518506
and here the parsedfile provider:
http://pastie.org/518507
Now, this is
Hi
> I am trying to install the latest unstable binary of rubygems using the
> following exec
>
> exec { "latestrubygems":
>command => "sudo apt-get -t unstable install rubygems"
> }
>
> I have the apt.conf and the sources.list file updated correctly for this
> command to work. This
Udo Waechter wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I have just started to implement my first type and a parsed-file
> provider for it.
>
> It is called nfs_export and it should manage nfs-exports via
> /etc/exports. First, here is the type:
> http://pastie.org/518506
> and here the parsedfile provider:
> http
Peter Meier wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>> I am trying to install the latest unstable binary of rubygems using the
>> following exec
>>
>> exec { "latestrubygems":
>>command => "sudo apt-get -t unstable install rubygems"
>> }
>>
>> I have the apt.conf and the sources.list file updated correctly
Ok, I have the solution:
The provider now creates lines where the $name ist stored as a comment,
then I can use this to identify the resources.
see: http://pastie.org/518507 for the working version.
Thanks,
udo.
On 20.06.2009, at 20:19, Joe McDonagh wrote:
Udo Waechter wrote:
Hello all.
I
Hi.
You could create an empty /etc/apt/sources.list
Or you could use the file_splice method:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/BracketEditor
We do have the standard distribution repositories in /etc/apt/
sources.list and additional contrib repositories in /etc/apt/
sources.list.d
Th
On Jun 20, 4:28 pm, Udo Waechter
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> You could create an empty /etc/apt/sources.list
I would actually like this file to be build from the contents I
provide. I have local mirrors of the Ubuntu repositories (for
binaries), so I want to override this file. Plus, if it is correct,
mo
On Sunday 21 June 2009 14:53:14 jchonig wrote:
> I think I could do what I wanted by building a bunch of files into a
> temp directory and then cattting them to /etc/apt/sources.list. But
> I'm wondring if there is an easier way.
Put files into /etc/apt/sources.d?
Apt does support wildcard inclu
jchonig wrote:
> I think I could do what I wanted by building a bunch of files into a
> temp directory and then cattting them to /etc/apt/sources.list. But
> I'm wondring if there is an easier way.
>
David Schmitt wrote a recipe for this, check out his `common' module
(hint: look for concatena
12 matches
Mail list logo
