what is this ?
2009/6/8 udai
>
> HOT SEXY COLLEGE GIRLS VIDEOS
>
> http://softtworld.com
>
> http://softtworld.com
>
> NUDE SEX ACTRESS IMAGES HOT MOVIE
>
> http://healthfitinsurance.blogspot.com
>
> http://healthfitinsurance.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Subhasis Dasgupta wrote:
> what is this ?
>
It's called Spam (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic) and it
slipped through the Google filters obviously.
Regards
James Turnbull
- --
Author of:
* Pro Linux Systems Administration
(http:
On Monday 08 June 2009 23:34:15 James Turnbull wrote:
> It's called Spam (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic) and it
> slipped through the Google filters obviously.
So, it's not a new Puppet feature then? I was sure that it would have helped
get buy-in to the idea...:)
--
Robin Jabb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin Sheat wrote:
> On Monday 08 June 2009 23:34:15 James Turnbull wrote:
>> It's called Spam (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic) and it
>> slipped through the Google filters obviously.
>
> So, it's not a new Puppet feature then? I was s
Hi
I try to do some things on the system, only if a directory exists. The
only way I see right now to achieve this is to create a custom fact
which returns true and fals. Is there a better solution?
BR
Rene
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because y
That's probably the cleanest way to do it.
A more hacky version would be to use an exec:
exec { "isithere":
command => "echo true",
onlyif => "test -d /some/path"
}
(I won't back the exact syntax there since I just pulled it out of thin air).
Trevor
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 09:08, Rene
Rene schrieb:
> Hi
>
> I try to do some things on the system, only if a directory exists. The
> only way I see right now to achieve this is to create a custom fact
> which returns true and fals. Is there a better solution?
Better solutions mostly revolve around getting the directory under
contr
Good idea, I try that
Thanks a lot
On Jun 8, 3:19 pm, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> That's probably the cleanest way to do it.
>
> A more hacky version would be to use an exec:
>
> exec { "isithere":
> command => "echo true",
> onlyif => "test -d /some/path"
>
> }
>
> (I won't back the ex
Yeah I know, that would be the best solution, but this directory is a
san device and is not there after kickstart and I want to be sure that
puppet runs without errors even the device is not there.
Thanks a lot for you help
BR
Rene
On Jun 8, 3:20 pm, David Schmitt wrote:
> Rene schrieb:
>
> >
Rene schrieb:
> Yeah I know, that would be the best solution, but this directory is a
> san device and is not there after kickstart and I want to be sure that
> puppet runs without errors even the device is not there.
If you are managing configuration of the device with puppet too, you
might wan
Thats a good point.
Right now I want to migrate our satellite configuration to puppet. If
that works well, I will try to move even the device configuration to
puppet.
Thanks for your help.
BR. Rene
On Jun 8, 3:34 pm, David Schmitt wrote:
> Rene schrieb:
>
> > Yeah I know, that would be the be
Hi all,
we're doing some test with new puppet server and we'd like to run many
clients against this new server.
So I tried to stop puppetd (or cron) in one client and run it by hand
like:
/usr/bin/ruby /usr/sbin/puppetd --server=new_server.domain.com --test
but I get:
warning: Certificate vali
2009/6/8 Arnau Bria :
>
> Hi all,
>
> we're doing some test with new puppet server and we'd like to run many
> clients against this new server.
> So I tried to stop puppetd (or cron) in one client and run it by hand
> like:
>
> /usr/bin/ruby /usr/sbin/puppetd --server=new_server.domain.com --test
I'm using puppet 0.24.7-4. I have a situation where I have some very long
running puppet runs in order to do upgrades (removing applications from load
balancers gracefully, et cetera).
My puppet runs triggered via puppetrun are finishing successfully:
Jun 8 20:31:29 puppetd[10178]: Finished cata
Hi everyone
Am I the only one that has stumbled upon this bug?
I've tried to raise the loglevel to info in config.ru, but it gives me
no further info, unfortunately. :-(
On Jun 6, 2009, at 23:05 , Juri Rischel Jensen wrote:
> Thanks for your answer - it helped me a bit further in the
> t
15 matches
Mail list logo
