We have "apt-get update" run from Puppet when /etc/apt/sources.list
changes. Sometimes the command exits with status=100. This seems to be a
soft or transient error, but I've not been able to find any details of
what it actually means.
Has anyone else experienced this?
--~--~-~--~~--
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 10:52 +, Keith Edmunds a écrit :
> We have "apt-get update" run from Puppet when /etc/apt/sources.list
> changes. Sometimes the command exits with status=100. This seems to be a
> soft or transient error, but I've not been able to find any details of
> what it actuall
I had this problem affect at least one server overnight; there might be
more.
I put in a new version of puppet and puppetmaster, and had to step away
before getting things all the way working. I left it in a state where
the puppetmaster was not running, but some puppetd were running.
(versio
Kyle Cordes wrote:
> Apparently, puppetd tries quite vigorously to connect. It generated
> 10GB of syslog and daemon.log overnight, full of this:
> Feb 26 07:45:10 tr11 puppetd[14683]: : Certificate retrieval failed:
> Could not connect to puppet on port 8140
A more enlightened syslogd on a
Kyle Cordes wrote:
> 70,000 times per minute, is a bit too often to attempt to connect ;-)
Look for "-w 0" in the puppetd arguments, common in Debian and Ubuntu
packages. Change it to something like "-w 120" to make it only check for
certificates every 2 minutes. I've had the exact same thing
Mike Renfro wrote:
> Look for "-w 0" in the puppetd arguments, common in Debian and Ubuntu
> packages. Change it to something like "-w 120" to make it only check for
> certificates every 2 minutes. I've had the exact same thing happen in
Ouch. This seems like:
a) a really awful choice for t
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Kyle Cordes wrote:
> Ouch. This seems like:
>
> a) a really awful choice for the Debian / Ub packages
Yep.
> b) a feature that Puppet would be much better off without.
>
>
> I can't imagine a compelling use case for a "pound on the server
> continuously" setting
Paul Lathrop wrote:
>> I can't imagine a compelling use case for a "pound on the server
>> continuously" setting; and I'm not surprised, with some years of
> Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I
> use -w 0 intentionally and happily, and there is a compelling use ca
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Kyle Cordes wrote:
> I am sure there is a good use for some aspect of the -w 0 feature; the
> part I don't think there is a good use for, is writing 70,000 entries
> per minute to syslog, or for trying to connect in a tight loop for 12
> hours. I am sure there is
On 2/26/2009 11:14 AM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Kyle Cordes wrote:
>> I am sure there is a good use for some aspect of the -w 0 feature; the
>> part I don't think there is a good use for, is writing 70,000 entries
>> per minute to syslog, or for trying to connect in
Paul Lathrop wrote:
> You may be right. On the other hand, powerful tools *often* provide
> ways of shooting oneself in the foot. One might make a similar
I heartily agree; what I am looking at is the difference between:
a) it is possible to type "sudo rm -rf /"
b) making rm default to a path
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mike Renfro wrote:
>
> On 2/26/2009 11:14 AM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Kyle Cordes wrote:
>>> I am sure there is a good use for some aspect of the -w 0 feature; the
>>> part I don't think there is a good use for, is writing 70,000 e
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Kyle Cordes wrote:
> I heartily agree; what I am looking at is the difference between:
>
> a) it is possible to type "sudo rm -rf /"
>
> b) making rm default to a path of "/" and default -r -f options ON, and
> include it in sudoers by default.
>
>
> Obviously B i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all Gentoo people
A number of people have had issues with the current Gentoo package provider.
There is a re-write available that uses equery instead of eix.
You can see the branch and a patch at:
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1658
no good
with just ensure => directory, on solaris i get it to create the file
(so no change):
r...@puppetsun:~# rm -rf /var/log/sysinfo
r...@puppetsun:~# /opt/csw/bin/puppetd -vt | grep sysinfo
notice: //Node[default]/defaultnode/shared-default/sysinfo/File[/var/
log/sysinfo]/ensure: created
r..
Despite originally appearing to not work, it actually does. I modified
the wrong part of the file.
Thanks for that AJ.
... no i have to get solaris to be able to access the files in modules
and i'll be ready to deploy :D
chakkerz
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You receive
In
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/1dc2dbac1f6cc0de?hl=en
I was asking about pushing passwd.db out to clients, and James pointed
me to Exported Resources. I've read up on Exported Resources, but I'm
not getting where I want. The wiki has
http://reductivelabs.com
Steven Nemetz wrote:
> Is there a way to pass parameters to rpm with the package type?
>
> I have some rpms that need to be installed with --nodeps
What sort of packages do you need to do this with? It sounds like
broken packages (which often come from proprietary vendors that don't
know how to p
Hello there
i'm getting a stack of the follwoing errors:
err: Could not call fileserver.list: #
err: //Node[default]/defaultnode/shared-default/homedirectories/File[/
etc/pam_ssh/eric]: Failed to generate additional resources during
transaction: Too many open files - socket(2)
err: //Node[defaul
i sounds extremely exactly like http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1844
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To
here's most of my class, if I comment out the bottom 3 clauses , the 3
key files get copied. otherwise it doesn't get copied. what am i
doing wrong ?
class openvpn {
file {"/etc/openvpn/keys":
ensure => exists ,
ensure => present ,
ensure => d
I have the same problem but don't have a puppet.conf just puppetmasterd.conf.
Puppetmaster always tries to bind to the default port, here is the command I'm
running:
/usr/sbin/puppetmasterd --manifest=/etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
--servertype=mongrel --masterport=18140
--pidfile=/var/run/pup
Fixed. This was due to lacking uuidtools and builder gems on the server.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Lenmarc wrote:
> I get this error when I try to run puppetd:
>
> err: Could not retrieve configuration: Uncaught exception no such file
> to load -- uuidtools in method puppetmaster.getconfi
I get this error when I try to run puppetd:
err: Could not retrieve configuration: Uncaught exception no such file
to load -- uuidtools in method puppetmaster.getconfig
# puppetd --listen --verbose --ignorecache --server server.corp.com
** Ruby version is not up-to-date; loading cgi_multipart_eo
The packages are ok (straight CentOS 4), but the OS is our own dialect
(modified from CentOS 4). So, I end up with some packages that depend on
others only to create a directory or a config file that puppet will be
doing anyways. I don't want to install the dependence because it
installs other stu
On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:00 AM, hOOlä'gOO khän wrote:
>
> here's most of my class, if I comment out the bottom 3 clauses , the 3
> key files get copied. otherwise it doesn't get copied. what am i
> doing wrong ?
>
> class openvpn {
> file {"/etc/openvpn/keys":
> ensure => exis
2009/2/27 Bjørn Dyresen
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:00 AM, hOOlä'gOO khän wrote:
>
>
>> here's most of my class, if I comment out the bottom 3 clauses , the 3
>> key files get copied. otherwise it doesn't get copied. what am i
>> doing wrong ?
>>
>> class openvpn {
>> file {"/etc/openvpn/key
27 matches
Mail list logo
