It seems like you don't know that :: has special meaning? If you do
this:
class foo {
class bar {
}
}
then you can refer to the inner class as foo::bar. By naming a
class manually with ::, it seems like you might be confusing puppet,
especially with more than one set of ::. I don't kn
Hmm,
that is really strange, since according to:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ModuleOrganisation
and especially the "Module Lookup" section on that page, I got the
impression that this naming scheme is perfectly valid.
Also, I remember from the discussion about CommonModules, that p
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Jeff wrote:
> I was trying to follow the passenger howto and while passenger seems
> to be answering properly for the puppetmaster, the puppet clients all
> complain with this error:
>
> Could not describe /files/etc/portage/package.keywords: Wrong content-
> typ
I'm working on a definition for activating/deactivating Apache modules
on an Ubuntu system. Inside my Apache class I have this definition:
define module($ensure) {
case $ensure {
enabled: { exec { "a2enmod":
command => "/usr/sbin/a2enmod $na
2008/12/28 Ben Beuchler
>
> I was under the impression that Exec expressly allows duplicate
> definitions. What am I misunderstanding? Is there a better way to
> structure this definition?
>
Ah, nope. No resource title can be duplicated, exec isn't an exception.
Is there somewhere you read
