Hello,
> > I have a bunch of variables that are used in several classes and
> > definitions, all part of the same module.
> >
> > As these variables are defined automatically based on system facts,
> > I would like to avoid having to declare them in each node that uses
> > classes or definitions
Paul,
Yes puppetmasterd has been restarted several times but no luck. I'm
upgrading all the clients to facter-1.5.2 now, and once that done I
may either upgrade all the clients to puppet-0.24.5, or downgrade the
server to 0.24.4, that way both the clients and the server will have
the same versio
On Sep 30, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Nicolas Arias wrote:
> when a node tries to send a report it drops the following error:
>
> err: Reporting failed: undefined method `graph' for
> #
Could you possibly be running different versions of Puppet on the hosts?
If not, can we get a stack trace (with --tra
On Sep 29, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Felix Schäfer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 29.09.2008 um 18:40 schrieb Marc Fournier:
>
>> I have a bunch of variables that are used in several classes and
>> definitions, all part of the same module.
>>
>> As these variables are defined automatically based on system fac
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:15 PM, pavel wrote:
>
> I am trying get puppet to write log data using rrdtool to be used by
> PuppetView. I have installed all the rrdtool packages including ruby-
> rrdtool.
>
> Here are by puppet configs:
> reports = rrdgraph, store
> reportdir = /var/www/ht
Ok, I have gotten Puppet up and running. I am about to start testing
out some more of the functions but there does not appear to be any
place that describes all the options to a function.
For example File: I have seen examples with
file { /etc/passwd: mode->777, ensure->file, owner->nobody, gro
I'm working on a turnkey Linux system where the post build config is handled
with puppet.
One of the unique constraints with a turnkey system is that passwords are
essentially set at build time and then stay fixed for the life of the
product.
I was wondering if anyone had used puppet to manage user
On Oct 1, 2008, at 8:02 AM, udo waechter wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I have a question regarding virtual resources and the exporting/
> collection thereof.
>
> I have several hosts that should export one and the same file
> resource. This should be collected exactly once by one host.
> The res
First of all, File and it's ilk are not "functions", they are "types"
or even better "resource types". Second, the reference you are looking
for is:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/TypeReference
Hope that helps!
--Paul
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you get debug logs on the client and server?
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:25 AM, josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> Yes puppetmasterd has been restarted several times but no luck. I'm
> upgrading all the clients to facter-1.5.2 now, and once that done I
> may either upgrade all the cl
Or, how are people handling things like setting up sendmail to refer
all outgoing mail to a smarthost down the line?
I could have a script, check whether I'd edited sendmail.mc, edit it
if needed, and run make in /etc/mail. That doesn't somehow sound very
"puppety", if I'm getting any feel for h
package { "something": ensure => latest } ?
Do people mostly use it, mostly not use it, is it highly in dispute,
or is there consensus?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post
dd-b wrote:
> package { "something": ensure => latest } ?
>
> Do people mostly use it, mostly not use it, is it highly in dispute,
> or is there consensus?
>
It's there when you need it, but it may have unsuspected results if you
do not have control over what updates to the package are availa
On 10/2/2008 2:15 PM, dd-b wrote:
> I could have a script, check whether I'd edited sendmail.mc, edit it
> if needed, and run make in /etc/mail. That doesn't somehow sound very
> "puppety", if I'm getting any feel for how puppet really intends
> things to work.
http://www.cfwiki.org/cfwiki/inde
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:17 PM, dd-b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> package { "something": ensure => latest } ?
>
> Do people mostly use it, mostly not use it, is it highly in dispute,
> or is there consensus?
>
It depends on your specific situation. I tend to just use present to
be sure the paca
Hi,
Its not a permission issue i checked that. Looks like a big of some
sort. Maybe the Version of puppet and the version of rrdtool?
thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To p
Andrew Shafer wrote:
> I think the only time that makes sense is if you control the package
> repos, then you can make some relatively safe assumptions and update the
> repo as part of the change control process.
>
Agreed ;-)
-Jeroen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Yes I can. The server will have a LOT of log info as it's serving up
just under 700 clients, but I can pick a few clients and enable debug
logging for them and report back.
On Oct 2, 2:32 pm, "Andrew Shafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you get debug logs on the client and server?
>
> On Thu
On Oct 2, 2:55 pm, Mike Renfro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.cfwiki.org/cfwiki/index.php/Editfiles_Considered_Harmfulmay
> be a good starting point for one point of view (i.e., that editing
> config files on the client systems can be a problem for auditing and
> other things). The alt
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, dd-b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That article is quite a good description of one position, definitely.
> I believe in all the problems he describes happening; I've seen them
> or things closely related, in various contexts.
>
> Storing a whole file and pulling it d
Heh, well I guess that is why I could find it. :)
Thanks that is a great start!
On Oct 2, 1:22 pm, "Paul Lathrop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, File and it's ilk are not "functions", they are "types"
> or even better "resource types". Second, the reference you are looking
> for is:
I've done that on openbsd systems with something like this:
exec { "setpass $name":
onlyif => "grep '^$name:\*' /etc/master.passwd",
command => "usermod -p '$pwstring' $name",
require => User[$name],
}
Note that the onlyif on this command is intended to set the password
only on accounts th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward wrote:
> Heh, well I guess that is why I could find it. :)
>
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/DocumentationStart
Plus there is:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/GettingStarted
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/Gett
The help in puppet (the puppet executable, I mean, not necessarily the
entire package) says things like "Runs a stand-alone +puppet+
script". I'm guessing that's just obsolete terminology, and it means
"manifests"; and the example shows it being applied to a .pp file.
Can I use say "puppet site
I think the only time that makes sense is if you control the package repos,
then you can make some relatively safe assumptions and update the repo as
part of the change control process.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> dd-b wrote:
> > package { "som
This has info but nor sure what to make of it:
http://thr3ads.net/puppet-users/2007/03/189581-rrdgraphs
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppe
dd-b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> package { "something": ensure => latest } ?
>
> Do people mostly use it, mostly not use it, is it highly in dispute,
> or is there consensus?
We don't use it because we don't tightly control when things go into our
repository and sometimes upload things we don
On Oct 1, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Silflay Hraka wrote:
> Anyone seen this error before when trying to start a blastwave-
> installed puppet on a Solaris 9 server?
>
> # puppetd --server ppserv.net.unc.edu --waitforcert 60 --test
> /opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates.rb:8: You
> m
I'm probably not understanding how facts work, but I'm hoping that
somehow if a fact gets loaded by the puppetmaster, it could be used as
a variable by all puppet clients, but this is turning out not to be
the case.
On my puppetmaster, I've got a ruby script that parses a simple text
file located
qbert980 wrote:
> I'm probably not understanding how facts work, but I'm hoping that
> somehow if a fact gets loaded by the puppetmaster, it could be used as
> a variable by all puppet clients, but this is turning out not to be
> the case.
Facts are evaluated on each client, including the puppetm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dd-b wrote:
> The help in puppet (the puppet executable, I mean, not necessarily the
> entire package) says things like "Runs a stand-alone +puppet+
> script". I'm guessing that's just obsolete terminology, and it means
> "manifests"; and the exampl
31 matches
Mail list logo
