[Puppet Users] Re: ANNOUNCE: Facter 1.5.1

2008-09-09 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (GMail)
David Lutterkort wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:16 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: >> Facter version 1.5.1 is now released. There is quite a lot there >> including Microsoft Windows support for a number of facts! >> >> Thanks to Paul Nasrat for all his efforts on the Windows support and >> this r

[Puppet Users] Puppet + openpkg

2008-09-09 Thread tarjei
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, has anyone looked at using puppet to manage openpkg instances? I'm considering to use openpkg to get the latest and gratest - but it has to fit with puppet :) kind regards, Tarjei -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) C

[Puppet Users] London Training Sept 29th - Oct 3rd

2008-09-09 Thread Teyo Tyree
*There are still a few available slots for our London Training!* * Location:* * *The training will be held at the First Intuition facility conveniently located near the BT Tower in central London. The facility will provide wireless internet access and coffee, tea and light snacks will be s

[Puppet Users] Re: London Training Sept 29th - Oct 3rd

2008-09-09 Thread Mike Pountney
Hi Teyo, Is this an ideal time to arrange a London Puppeteers meetup? It would be great to meet you, if you have time, and I think it's been a while since the last one. How about the weds evening? This would allow for anyone on the just the beginners or advanced courses to attend... Rega

[Puppet Users] Re: Exclusions in site.pp?

2008-09-09 Thread Heiko
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:40 PM, josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK thanks Paul. hrm back to the drawing board then, or I just > manually set the domain name on each box first. > Hello, i do some matching for domains inside the classes: case $domain { "domain1": { $hostopt

[Puppet Users] Re: Managing Postfix Configuration

2008-09-09 Thread Darryl Ross
Thanks for this, the snippet below worked great, with a couple of minor changes, on my CentOS 5 system: - full path to /usr/bin/test - single equal in 'false' test Thanks Francois! Regards Darryl Francois Deppierraz wrote: > Darryl Ross wrote: > >> What is the recommended way of managing

[Puppet Users] Re: ordering issue

2008-09-09 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Charles Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I presume this to mean "chattr +i"-style immutable. > > Frankly, I would think it a bug if puppet /did/ try to control the > immutable bit by default -- the only thing I've used that bit for in > years is as a cheap hack to convince automated management

[Puppet Users] Re: London Training Sept 29th - Oct 3rd

2008-09-09 Thread AndyH
On Sep 9, 1:21 pm, Mike Pountney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Teyo, > > Is this an ideal time to arrange a London Puppeteers meetup? It would   > be great to meet you, if you have time, and I think it's been a while   > since the last one. > > How about the weds evening? This would allow for an

[Puppet Users] known modules repositories

2008-09-09 Thread The Anarcat
So it seems a few people have developped a good few modules on their own, something I clumsily complained about earlier... Now I always have a hard time finding those repositories before starting to write my own module. So I took the liberty of going back into my mail archive and add the ones I kn

[Puppet Users] Re: known modules repositories

2008-09-09 Thread AJ
Thanks for updating the page. The Koumbit one doesn't work for me.. Regards, AJ On 10/09/2008, at 3:48 AM, The Anarcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it seems a few people have developped a good few modules on their > own, something I clumsily complained about earlier... > > Now I always hav

[Puppet Users] Re: Exclusions in site.pp?

2008-09-09 Thread josh
Interesting, thanks. None of the puppet clients really have a DNS domain set, they don't use DNS for anything. Some of them have hostname.domain.net, some hostname.domain.com, others hostname.domainfromthedslmodem, some just hostname, I guess I could force all hosts to be the same TLD using your

[Puppet Users] Re: Debugging Puppet/Puppetmasterd

2008-09-09 Thread Nigel Kersten
Somewhat related when trying to improve performance is doing debugging of how long operations take. Puppet already makes some use of this, but it's worth noting that for a given section of code, you can use the existing Benchmark code to do this. ie you can surround a code block with something li

[Puppet Users] job posting - Senior Engineer @ Speakeasy.net

2008-09-09 Thread Garrett Honeycutt
Put your love of puppet to work with us at Speakeasy. We need Engineers who want to use puppet in conjunction with re-architecting our infrastructure. We are based in downtown Seattle, overlooking Elliot Bay. Please send your resume or any questions directly to me and off-list. Thanks, -g

[Puppet Users] template question

2008-09-09 Thread Grumpus
Hi. I'm trying to accomplish something like this: node "node1" { $foo_var1 = true include foo } node "node2" { $foo_var1 = true $foo_var2 = true include foo } class foo { file { "/etc/foo.conf": content => template("foo.conf.erb"), } } And the foo

[Puppet Users] Re: template question

2008-09-09 Thread Grumpus
OK. I screwed that up royally... sorry for not proofing before hitting send. Here is the corrected template: <% if defined? foo_var1 %> ... stuff to be included for nodes where foo_var1 is defined ... <% end %> <% if defined? foo_var2 %> ... stuff to be included for nodes where

[Puppet Users] Re: template question

2008-09-09 Thread Andrew Shafer
try <% if defined? @foo_var1 %> note the @ On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Grumpus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK. I screwed that up royally... sorry for not proofing > before hitting send. Here is the corrected template: > > > <% if defined? foo_var1 %> >... stuff to be included for

[Puppet Users] Re: template question

2008-09-09 Thread Andrew Shafer
Actually, what version of puppet are you using? On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Andrew Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > try > > <% if defined? @foo_var1 %> > > note the @ > > > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Grumpus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> OK. I screwed that up royally... sor