On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 16:28, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Pittman
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for not getting back to this sooner. If you are running 2.7.10,
>> can you try removing the file
>> `puppet/util/instrumentation/listeners/process_name.rb` and see if
>> t
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> Sorry for not getting back to this sooner. If you are running 2.7.10,
> can you try removing the file
> `puppet/util/instrumentation/listeners/process_name.rb` and see if
> that fixes the problem?
>
No worries Daniel. Yes. It did fix the
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 17:19, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
>>>
>>> Damn. Well, at least we eliminated one possible cause. Is there any
>>> chance you can run with `--debug` enabled on one of the failed
>>> machines, and see if that points to the
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> Damn. Well, at least we eliminated one possible cause. Is there any
>> chance you can run with `--debug` enabled on one of the failed
>> machines, and see if that points to the right place? Otherwise we
>> have to start to get into some f
>
> Damn. Well, at least we eliminated one possible cause. Is there any
> chance you can run with `--debug` enabled on one of the failed
> machines, and see if that points to the right place? Otherwise we
> have to start to get into some fairly heavy ways to figure out what is
> going on.
>
OK
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:40, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> RedHat released some update kernels that reintroduced a bug from the
>> 2.6.13 Linux kernel. You can run any of the code in this gist to
>> check if your kernel suffers that: https://gi
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Daniel Pittman
wrote:
> RedHat released some update kernels that reintroduced a bug from the
> 2.6.13 Linux kernel. You can run any of the code in this gist to
> check if your kernel suffers that: https://gist.github.com/441278
>
> The C code is obviously a pretty
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 23:56, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Brian Gallew wrote:
>>
>> If you are like me, the problem is that the ruby for your platform sucks.
>> The webstack ruby 1.8.7 for Solaris 10 has a nasty tendency to hang (for
>> the daemons) and core dump for
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Brian Gallew wrote:
> If you are like me, the problem is that the ruby for your platform sucks.
> The webstack ruby 1.8.7 for Solaris 10 has a nasty tendency to hang (for
> the daemons) and core dump for individual runs. Individual runs out of a
> crontab are the
If you are like me, the problem is that the ruby for your platform sucks.
The webstack ruby 1.8.7 for Solaris 10 has a nasty tendency to hang (for
the daemons) and core dump for individual runs. Individual runs out of a
crontab are the most reliable way I've found to make it all work.
On Tue, Fe
10 matches
Mail list logo
