Thanks Stefan. A bug (originally a doc bug) and subsequent discussion
at Puppetlabs is documented here:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/8096
ken.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Stefan Schulte
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:37:25PM +0100, Ken Barber wrote:
>> So it would appear the
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:37:25PM +0100, Ken Barber wrote:
> So it would appear the parameter 'name' acts as namevar for file and
> exec at least ... its not defined in the type for these explicitly -
> it seems implicit. This seems historical and I haven't seen it used
> before (at least I've nev
So it would appear the parameter 'name' acts as namevar for file and
exec at least ... its not defined in the type for these explicitly -
it seems implicit. This seems historical and I haven't seen it used
before (at least I've never used it myself). Does anyone know the
history behind this?
The f
