Re: [Puppet Users] development workflow

2016-11-08 Thread Rob Nelson
Code Manager is PE only, so if you're using opensource then r10k it is. I still use r10k with PE, though, because CM is missing the equivalent of 'r10k deploy module'. Both work very well. Rob Nelson rnels...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Robert wrote: > Dear List, > > Puppet start

Re: [Puppet Users] development workflow

2016-11-08 Thread Craig Dunn
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > > Anyway, if others have experiences and suggestions, they're welcome. > > > Check out gogs.io. Doesn't have CI built in but it's so light and easy to > deploy and run it's well worth a consideration over gitlab > > > Gogs is very good, especial

Re: [Puppet Users] development workflow

2016-11-07 Thread R.I.Pienaar
> On 7 Nov 2016, at 14:22, Robert wrote: > > Thanks! > > When I said Bitbucket I meant the in-house Bitbucket instance as well - > storing anything outside our infrastructure is not really an option. > Actually we compared Bitbucket and Git_Hub_ earlier and chose Bitbucket, but > kind of aba

Re: [Puppet Users] development workflow

2016-11-07 Thread Robert
Thanks! When I said Bitbucket I meant the in-house Bitbucket instance as well - storing anything outside our infrastructure is not really an option. Actually we compared Bitbucket and Git_Hub_ earlier and chose Bitbucket, but kind of abandoned the whole evaluation since it wasn't really needed yet

Re: [Puppet Users] development workflow

2016-11-07 Thread Paul Seward
Hi, An in-house gitlab server will let you do 2,3,4,5 and 7, gitlab supports webhooks to r10k/code manager which will do 6 for you. It's easy to set up (and there are puppet modules that will help you do that) and you don't have to persuade your compliance/governance dept to let you keep everythi