Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet and Windows ACLs (Access Control Lists)

2014-05-01 Thread Joaquin Menchaca
I think to illustrate is better to make it more clear, let me get back to you on this, once I look it over. On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:21:48 AM UTC-7, Rob Reynolds wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Joaquin Menchaca > > > wrote: > >> What is most important to me is to have the

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet and Windows ACLs (Access Control Lists)

2014-04-30 Thread Rob Reynolds
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Joaquin Menchaca wrote: > What is most important to me is to have the ability to set ACLS on > existing resources, such as file, service, and registry (and other > objects). > We are starting with file, once we have that solid, we'll accept other target types - ht

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet and Windows ACLs (Access Control Lists)

2013-10-28 Thread Rob Reynolds
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:42 AM, jcbollinger wrote: > > > On Monday, October 28, 2013 2:55:32 AM UTC-5, Klavs Klavsen wrote: >> >> >> >> Den fredag den 25. oktober 2013 22.10.40 UTC+2 skrev Rob Reynolds: >> > [...] > >> The format could look something like the following: >>> >>> acl { 'c:/windows/

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet and Windows ACLs (Access Control Lists)

2013-10-28 Thread Rob Reynolds
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Klavs Klavsen wrote: > > > Den fredag den 25. oktober 2013 22.10.40 UTC+2 skrev Rob Reynolds: > >> tl;dr: Windows manages permissions in a way that doesn't always translate >> well to mode. We're putting together a solution for this. Jump in the >> discussion. >>