On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Oliver Hookins wrote:
>> On Aug 31, 10:09 am, Kenneth Holter wrote:
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> Are there any rule of thumb regarding using "inherits" versus "include"? For
>>> example, if I'm creating the class "
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> I still feel like we don't have a good term for "namespace" children
> classes, as in a succinct and accurate term for the relationship
> between "syslog" and "syslog::foo". They're not child classes, they're
> ... ?
How about BFF?
Cohorts
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Oliver Hookins wrote:
> On Aug 31, 10:09 am, Kenneth Holter wrote:
>> Hello all.
>>
>> Are there any rule of thumb regarding using "inherits" versus "include"? For
>> example, if I'm creating the class "syslog::base" which should servere as a
>> building block for
