On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 11:07:07 AM UTC-5, J.T. Conklin wrote:
>
> Rob Nelson > writes:
> > Silly question, but what package manager doesn't let you upgrade those
> > two packages independently but also doesn't update the dependent
> > packages at the same time?
>
> We have this problem
On 4/19/16 9:06 AM, J.T. Conklin wrote:
Rob Nelson writes:
Silly question, but what package manager doesn't let you upgrade those
two packages independently but also doesn't update the dependent
packages at the same time?
We have this problem on CentOS machines using the yum provider. The log
That's weird, but I guess it kind of makes sense as they're independent.
Shame they have conflicts, though. It looks like, of all things, it's the
shared man pages causing the problem...
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5489
I assume you have both versions on purpose, but in case that wasn't th
Rob Nelson writes:
> Silly question, but what package manager doesn't let you upgrade those
> two packages independently but also doesn't update the dependent
> packages at the same time?
We have this problem on CentOS machines using the yum provider. The logs
reported something to the effect of
Silly question, but what package manager doesn't let you upgrade those two
packages independently but also doesn't update the dependent packages at
the same time?
On Monday, April 18, 2016, J.T. Conklin wrote:
> Before we started using puppet at work, we didn't have a systematic
> process to ins
