Re: [Puppet Users] Facter ignores interfaces with non eth names

2010-10-05 Thread Christopher Johnston
I got this working by modifying the regex which seems to be explicit for a specific output, but in reality it could be simpler - unless I am missing something. This change works for me now and I tested various interface names (eth0, eth0.100, bond0, eth, WAN, LAN). Thoughts? $ git diff ip.rb dif

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter ignores interfaces with non eth names

2010-10-05 Thread Christopher Johnston
Yes, but by X you mean they are represented with a digit? I have systems that do not have interfaces represented with the name and then a digit (WAN, LAN, BACKUP, etc). The regex looks to not pick those interfaces up. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Joe McDonagh wrote: > On 10/04/2010 05:35 PM,

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter ignores interfaces with non eth names

2010-10-05 Thread Joe McDonagh
On 10/04/2010 05:35 PM, Christopher Johnston wrote: Does facter support NICs that are not named ethX? I happen to use custom names on my systems. Just a quick look at the code I don't see why it wouldn't but the behavior I am seeing is very different. -- You received this message because you ar

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter ignores interfaces with non eth names

2010-10-04 Thread Paul Nasrat
On 4 October 2010 15:21, Christopher Johnston wrote: > I am using 1.58, I see the issue though.  I have interfaces called wan and > lan without a \d+ at the end.  Looks they are getting skipped.  I will play > with the regex to see whats up. The whole way this works is going to be revisited for 2

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter ignores interfaces with non eth names

2010-10-04 Thread Christopher Johnston
I am using 1.58, I see the issue though. I have interfaces called wan and lan without a \d+ at the end. Looks they are getting skipped. I will play with the regex to see whats up. On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Gary Law wrote: > On 4 October 2010 22:35, Christopher Johnston wrote: > > Does

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter ignores interfaces with non eth names

2010-10-04 Thread Gary Law
On 4 October 2010 22:35, Christopher Johnston wrote: > Does facter support NICs that are not named ethX? I happen to use custom > names on my systems.  Just a quick look at the code I don't see why it > wouldn't but the behavior I am seeing is very different. works for me: g...@sv01:~ $ facter |