Re: [Puppet Users] Dependency Cycle Weirdness

2011-08-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
Actually, no, I think you DO need it. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: > Oh. I didn't realise that. Thought it was darn Thanks. > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Scott Smith wrote: > >> Don't think you need to include if there is a require >> On Aug 17, 201

Re: [Puppet Users] Dependency Cycle Weirdness

2011-08-17 Thread Douglas Garstang
Oh. I didn't realise that. Thought it was darn Thanks. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Scott Smith wrote: > Don't think you need to include if there is a require > On Aug 17, 2011 9:50 AM, "Douglas Garstang" > wrote: > > If I have: > > > > class service::common { > > file { > > '/etc/

Re: [Puppet Users] Dependency Cycle Weirdness

2011-08-17 Thread Scott Smith
Don't think you need to include if there is a require On Aug 17, 2011 9:50 AM, "Douglas Garstang" wrote: > If I have: > > class service::common { > file { > '/etc/foo': > ensure => directory; > > '/etc/init.d/ss-functions': > content => template('service/etc/init.d/ss-functions.erb'), > require =>