Re: [Puppet Users] yum.puppetlabs.com for fedora 17

2012-07-10 Thread Todd Zullinger
Matthaus Litteken wrote: Yes, we are working on packaging Fedora 17, but as Brian suspected, we haven't worked out the kinks in packaging against Ruby 1.9.x. If someone has patches to submit against the spec file in conf/redhat/puppet.spec that will allow for a ruby 1.9 build, please submit a

Re: [Puppet Users] yum.puppetlabs.com for fedora 17

2012-07-02 Thread Matthaus Litteken
Yes, we are working on packaging Fedora 17, but as Brian suspected, we haven't worked out the kinks in packaging against Ruby 1.9.x. If someone has patches to submit against the spec file in conf/redhat/puppet.spec that will allow for a ruby 1.9 build, please submit a pull request. If you want to h

Re: [Puppet Users] yum.puppetlabs.com for fedora 17

2012-07-02 Thread Brian Gupta
I would guess part of the issue is related to testing against ruby 1.9.x, which Fedora now ships with, but someone from Puppetlabs should confirm. -Brian On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Matthew Nicholson wrote: > I notice fedora 17 isn't in there yet.Any time frame for this release > being pack

[Puppet Users] yum.puppetlabs.com for fedora 17

2012-07-02 Thread Matthew Nicholson
I notice fedora 17 isn't in there yet.Any time frame for this release being packaged up? Glad to help out rebuilding srpms -- Matthew Nicholson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-