Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-21 Thread Melissa Stone
It looks like the metadata didn't fully update the first time around. It's been updated now, and should work. Can I get some additional confirmation on that from someone? On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:19 AM Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > And did you update the yum database

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-21 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
And did you update the yum database after that ? I'm getting strange results. > Le 20 avr. 2016 à 16:55, Melissa Stone a écrit : > > Thanks for reporting this, everyone. I've fixed the packages on > yum.puppetlabs.com , and I'll start investigating > apt.puppetlabs.

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-20 Thread Rick Sherman
Hi chrido, I'm trying to reproduce the issue you saw. Could you please provide the Puppet related output of apt-key finger Thank you, Rick Sherman Release Engineering, Puppet On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 9:55:04 AM UTC-5, chrido wrote: > > Similiar problems with apt: > W: GPG error: http://

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-20 Thread Melissa Stone
Thanks for reporting this, everyone. I've fixed the packages on yum.puppetlabs.com, and I'll start investigating apt.puppetlabs.com now. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:55 AM chrido wrote: > Similiar problems with apt: > W: GPG error: http://apt.puppetlabs.com wily Release: The following > signatures

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-20 Thread chrido
Similiar problems with apt: W: GPG error: http://apt.puppetlabs.com wily Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1054B7A24BD6EC30 Puppet Labs Release Key (Puppet Labs Release Key) There is a new pubkey in http://apt.puppetlabs.com/, are you changing the key? On Wednesday, April

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-20 Thread Kenton Brede
I'm getting the same for: Package puppetlabs-release-5-12.noarch.rpm is not signed Package puppetlabs-release-6-12.noarch.rpm is not signed Package puppetlabs-release-7-12.noarch.rpm is not signed Kenton Brede On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Jonathan Gazeley < jonathan.gaze...@bristol.ac.

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-20 Thread Artur Gadelshin
Hello. It brokes beaker tests either. 2016-04-20 12:11 GMT+03:00 Jonathan Gazeley : > This morning I noticed on yum.puppetlabs.com that > puppetlabs-release-6-12.noarch.rpm and puppetlabs-release-7-12.noarch.rpm > are not signed (possibly others too, I didn't check). My yum cron job is > bitchin

[Puppet Users] puppetlabs-release not signed

2016-04-20 Thread Jonathan Gazeley
This morning I noticed on yum.puppetlabs.com that puppetlabs-release-6-12.noarch.rpm and puppetlabs-release-7-12.noarch.rpm are not signed (possibly others too, I didn't check). My yum cron job is bitching about it because I don't allow unsigned packages. Is this a mistake? Thanks, Jonathan