John, thank you. I don't know how to write that kind of code yet; but at
least now I have something to research.
On Feb 10, 2016 9:33 PM, "John Warburton" wrote:
> Ah manual changes...
>
> Ok you need some way to identify which hosts use which hash type and
> classify them as such.
>
> We have a
On 2/10/16 9:33 PM, John Warburton wrote:
> Ah manual changes...
>
> Ok you need some way to identify which hosts use which hash type and
> classify them as such.
>
> We have an external node classifier, and we would set a parameter for
> the host to say hash_type => 'bsdmd5' for example. You co
Ah manual changes...
Ok you need some way to identify which hosts use which hash type and
classify them as such.
We have an external node classifier, and we would set a parameter for the
host to say hash_type => 'bsdmd5' for example. You could default if
osfamily is Redhat to not even look for th
John/Garret, thanks but the hash-type isn't specific to os&release, it is
manually defined/altered by the sysadmin.
Does that help any?
To be more detailed, I might have something like the following:
CentOS-6.X. 12 nodes all hash=sha-512,
Solaris 10u6 13 nodes all hash=bsdmd5, but...
Solaris 10u
Warron
Use the operatingsystemrelease fact and decide the hash to use based on
that.
It will spit out something like 10_u9 by reading /etc/release. This isn't
too bad, but if you patch a server built as u9 with a current patch set,
the actual OS will be u11 no matter what /etc/release says, so be
On 2/10/16 8:38 AM, Warron French wrote:
> Hello, I was hoping someone could help with answering this question, for
> the following scenario.
>
> On our network we have some OLD ( I mean 1/06, up to 1/09) Solaris 10
> SPARC servers and workstations along with newer Solaris 10 SPARC servers
> (runn
Hello, I was hoping someone could help with answering this question, for
the following scenario.
On our network we have some OLD ( I mean 1/06, up to 1/09) Solaris 10 SPARC
servers and workstations along with newer Solaris 10 SPARC servers (running
even the lastest revisions, like 1/13); and we
