Re: [Puppet Users] package provider for FreeBSD

2012-07-04 Thread Gregory Orange
On 29/06/12 14:38, Gregory Orange wrote: I've settled upon portupgrade as the best provider, since I can use it to build from the NFS mounted /usr/ports tree. Now I am experiencing a quirk when a package is to be newly installed: 'ensure => installed' or 'ensure => present' results in the packag

Re: [Puppet Users] package provider for FreeBSD

2012-06-28 Thread Gregory Orange
On 29/06/12 02:18, R. Tyler Croy wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Gregory Orange wrote: Are there providers documented somewhere? I'm not sure where to The different package resource providers and their differences documented here:

Re: [Puppet Users] package provider for FreeBSD

2012-06-28 Thread R. Tyler Croy
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Gregory Orange wrote: > Hi again, > From examples I have gleaned the following snippet for manifests/site.pp > > Package {provider => $operatingsystem ? { > FreeBSD => freebsd, > #FreeBSD => ports, > debian => aptitude, > redhat => up2da

[Puppet Users] package provider for FreeBSD

2012-06-28 Thread Gregory Orange
Hi again, From examples I have gleaned the following snippet for manifests/site.pp Package {provider => $operatingsystem ? { FreeBSD => freebsd, #FreeBSD => ports, debian => aptitude, redhat => up2date}} Are there providers documented somewhere? I'm not