Re: [Puppet Users] fighting packaging

2011-08-16 Thread Jordan Sissel
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Craig White wrote: > Clearly not a problem caused by puppet but something I can't apparently > deploy with puppet unless someone has an idea. > > Trying to automate a way to deploy mod_mono for apache > > from CLI, the problem seems obvious... > > apt-get install

Re: [Puppet Users] fighting packaging

2011-08-12 Thread Daniel Pittman
You should file a bug report against the package with Debian; we set the "noninteractive", and the "force yes", bits that absolutely *should* make it work fine in these circumstances. I am sorry that it doesn't work; if you find something we didn't do, that makes the prompt go away, please let us

Re: [Puppet Users] fighting packaging

2011-08-12 Thread Craig White
Appear that 'adminfile' option is a Solaris only thing. I found that ubuntu/debian has debconf-get-selections/debconf-set-selections packages which might actually get me there but it introduces new package dependencies and would take more time than it is reasonably worth as we will never have m

Re: [Puppet Users] fighting packaging

2011-08-12 Thread Nathan Clemons
Isn't there an adminfile option to the package resource that will let you pass responses as if it were an interactive session? Not sure if it's supported for the apt provider, but worth looking into if you haven't already. -- Nathan Clemons http://www.livemocha.com The worlds largest online langua

[Puppet Users] fighting packaging

2011-08-12 Thread Craig White
Clearly not a problem caused by puppet but something I can't apparently deploy with puppet unless someone has an idea. Trying to automate a way to deploy mod_mono for apache from CLI, the problem seems obvious... apt-get install -y --assume-yes libapache2-mod-mono mono-apache-server libmono-fi