Code Manager is PE only, so if you're using opensource then r10k it is. I
still use r10k with PE, though, because CM is missing the equivalent of
'r10k deploy module'. Both work very well.
Rob Nelson
rnels...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Robert wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> Puppet start
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
> Anyway, if others have experiences and suggestions, they're welcome.
>
>
> Check out gogs.io. Doesn't have CI built in but it's so light and easy to
> deploy and run it's well worth a consideration over gitlab
>
>
>
Gogs is very good, especial
> On 7 Nov 2016, at 14:22, Robert wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> When I said Bitbucket I meant the in-house Bitbucket instance as well -
> storing anything outside our infrastructure is not really an option.
> Actually we compared Bitbucket and Git_Hub_ earlier and chose Bitbucket, but
> kind of aba
Thanks!
When I said Bitbucket I meant the in-house Bitbucket instance as well -
storing anything outside our infrastructure is not really an option.
Actually we compared Bitbucket and Git_Hub_ earlier and chose Bitbucket,
but kind of abandoned the whole evaluation since it wasn't really needed
yet
Hi,
An in-house gitlab server will let you do 2,3,4,5 and 7, gitlab supports
webhooks to r10k/code manager which will do 6 for you.
It's easy to set up (and there are puppet modules that will help you do
that) and you don't have to persuade your compliance/governance dept to let
you keep everythi
Dear List,
Puppet started out as a PoC for us, to see if it's worth the investment in
time and energy. The answer is definitely yes, and we'd like to take some
sort of next step.
Which would be cooperation with smaller teams, versioning & review of code
and stuff.
So I'd like to hear your though
