Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-20 Thread jcbollinger
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:22:35 AM UTC-6, Jason Antman wrote: > > I'll wager that Michael is correct here (based on what he says, not just > his knowledge of packaging). > > Can you provide the actual, full names of the package in question, or > the rpm -qi output? > > My guess, based

Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-20 Thread Jason Antman
> Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes) >> >> ________________ >> From: "Richie Rees" >> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 8:33:35 AM >> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue >> &

Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-19 Thread Michael Stahnke
: puppet-users@googlegroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 8:33:35 AM > Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue > > > Hello again Ygor, > > Its a 64 bit internal package, its only built for the 64 bit platform. > there are a number of different ve

Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-19 Thread Dan White
: puppet-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 8:33:35 AM Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue Hello again Ygor, Its a 64 bit internal package, its only built for the 64 bit platform. there are a number of different versions in the repo but none of the sa

Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-19 Thread Richie Rees
> Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes) > > -- > *From: *"Richie Rees" > > *To: *puppet...@googlegroups.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:48:48 AM > *Subject: *[Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue > > Hi All, > > Come to borrow so

Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-19 Thread Dan White
From: "Richie Rees" To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:48:48 AM Subject: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue Hi All, Come to borrow some of your collective wisdom again, Seeing a problem installing an rpm using a fairly basic class o

Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-19 Thread Matthew Burgess
On 19 November 2013 09:48, Richie Rees wrote: > Hi All, > > Come to borrow some of your collective wisdom again, Seeing a problem > installing an rpm using a fairly basic class on a RHEL 5 box using yum as > the provider, I am seeing the following error message :- > > *Error: Could not update: F

[Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

2013-11-19 Thread Richie Rees
Hi All, Come to borrow some of your collective wisdom again, Seeing a problem installing an rpm using a fairly basic class on a RHEL 5 box using yum as the provider, I am seeing the following error message :- *Error: Could not update: Failed to update to version 5.35.0-3_el5 , got version 5.