On Oct 15, 2014 3:55 AM, "Frederic Conrotte"
wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Like many enterprises, we have an heterogeneous infrastructure with some
CentOS and Solaris machines.
>
> I was wondering if lookthere are existing plans about creating for
Solaris the equivalent of the "yumrepo" type ?
Unless this
Hello
Like many enterprises, we have an heterogeneous infrastructure with some
CentOS and Solaris machines.
I was wondering if there are existing plans about creating for Solaris the
equivalent of the "yumrepo" type ?
https://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/latest/type.html#yumrepo
Something l
Hi Peter et al,
Sorry for arriving rather late to this thread!
On 16/11/10 10:17, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On Nov 12, 4:54 pm, Peter Bonivart wrote:
>> I think the issue with "Not installed" vs. "notinst" is probably from
>> converting the pkg-get provider, if I'm not mistaken pkg-get prints
>> "No
On Nov 16, 11:17 am, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Pachine parseable output would be very nice, but in my opinion not
> that 'urgent'. We can parse it like it is.
I will add this as an option but not change the current output then.
Later, when you've had a chance to update the provider to use the
machin
On Nov 16, 3:52 pm, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> I have it checked into SVN so it will be in v2.3 but I haven't set a
> release date for it yet. Is it a showstopper for you? In that case I
> could roll a v2.2.1 for you with this.
Not for me personally. We will take this importunity to upgrade our
p
Hi Peter,
On Nov 12, 4:54 pm, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> Hi, I'm the author of pkgutil, I'm glad you're about to support it in
> Puppet since I get quite many requests for that.
It's nice you chip in here! We appreciate it.
> I think the issue with "Not installed" vs. "notinst" is probably from
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> We really need community testing with this provider. There are some
>> questions Rudy has in the ticket log that we need to get answered.
>>
>> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4258
>
> Hi, I'
On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> We really need community testing with this provider. There are some
> questions Rudy has in the ticket log that we need to get answered.
>
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4258
Hi, I'm the author of pkgutil, I'm glad you're about to support it in
P
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, windowsrefund wrote:
> Are there any plans to retrofit this into 0.25.x?
I haven't looked at the actual provider yet, but you should be able to
distribute it yourself with pluginsync to 0.25.x clients once it's
been sorted.
We really need community testing with th
Are there any plans to retrofit this into 0.25.x?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googleg
10 matches
Mail list logo
