2009/1/21 twpayne :
> ... the ruby SELinux
> bindings are not even available for my platform and it's not clear
> when/if they ever will be.
Further to my rant a couple of days ago, I've created a minimal set of
SELinux bindings which are sufficient for puppet. The software is at:
http://githu
I've just been really really badly bitten by the use of the ruby
selinux bindings, see
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/1852
The effect of the silent failure when the ruby SELinux bindings are
not installed is horrific. In short, every run of puppetd triggers a
refresh of everything.
> The Fedora Infrastructure folks are keen to use the SELinux support
> and have a mix of Fedora and RHEL boxes. And some of them happen to
> sit in the same offices as Dan Walsh, the libselinux maintainer for
> Fedora and RHEL. I believe that they're inquiring about enabling the
> ruby binding
Marc Fournier wrote:
> I've been this way. It appears this ruby binding is part of
> libselinux. It is generated with swig. {Centos,Redhat} 5.x ship with
> libselinux 1.33.4. Fedora 10 comes with 2.0.73.
>
> The API has changed between both versions. So a regular repackaging
> would be difficult (
> > Any idea how to get these ruby bindings installed on machines other
> > than fedora >= 10 ? It seems to be required for using selinux with
> > puppet 0.24.7.
>
> repackage it from the srpm? didn't do that yet, however i'll have to
> do it for centos some time. so would be nice if you can in
Hi
> Any idea how to get these ruby bindings installed on machines other than
> fedora >= 10 ? It seems to be required for using selinux with puppet 0.24.7.
repackage it from the srpm? didn't do that yet, however i'll have to
do it for centos some time. so would be nice if you can inform about
