Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Virtual Resource Visibility

2015-02-13 Thread jcbollinger
On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 10:15:19 AM UTC-6, Salty Old Cowdawg wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, jcbollinger > wrote: > >> so I have to think that you have some wrong expectation about the effect. >> >> > Based on some reading I did yesterday I must confess that may be tru

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Virtual Resource Visibility

2015-02-12 Thread Peter Berghold
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, jcbollinger wrote: > so I have to think that you have some wrong expectation about the effect. > > Based on some reading I did yesterday I must confess that may be true. My thinking was using that type of declaration made the fact the file was installed "visible"

[Puppet Users] Re: Virtual Resource Visibility

2015-02-10 Thread jcbollinger
Garett already gave you a good answer for the code as you presented it. But, On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 10:33:32 AM UTC-6, Salty Old Cowdawg wrote: class scripts::myscript { > @file{'my neat script': >path=>"/path/to/the/script", >