On 12/17/2012 03:44 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
> * Because the run stage in which a class should be applied isn't a
> characteristic of the class itself, but rather of how it is used
Yeah, that makes sense.
> Aha! My own biggest objection to run stages, straight out of someone
> else's mouth
On Friday, December 14, 2012 2:52:03 PM UTC-6, Jakov Sosic wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I am wondering why can't run stages get set inside the class?
>
> For example:
>
> class foo {
> stage main
> }
>
A few answers from different perspectives:
- Because the run stage in which a class should
