Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet replaces deleted files

2010-11-30 Thread Patrick
On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:25 AM, Os wrote: >> As in using your operating systems package management. If you're running >> Debian/Ubuntu that'll be a .deb, if you're using RedHat/CentOS/Fedora >> that'll be a .rpm. > > Thanks for the advice, thats something I did not think about but > absolutly solv

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet replaces deleted files

2010-11-30 Thread Os
> As in using your operating systems package management.  If you're running > Debian/Ubuntu that'll be a .deb, if you're using RedHat/CentOS/Fedora > that'll be a .rpm. Thanks for the advice, thats something I did not think about but absolutly solves my problem! Although I am a bit confused about

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet replaces deleted files

2010-11-29 Thread Adam Gibbins
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Mohit Chawla wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:21 PM, ZipKid wrote: > >> You should propably package these files. Then you will not have this >> problem. >> The replace option for the file type is NOT intended for what you are >> trying. >> > > Sorry for barging

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet replaces deleted files

2010-11-29 Thread Mohit Chawla
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:21 PM, ZipKid wrote: > You should propably package these files. Then you will not have this > problem. > The replace option for the file type is NOT intended for what you are > trying. > Sorry for barging in, but "package" the files, in the sense... ? -- You received

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet replaces deleted files

2010-11-29 Thread ZipKid
You should propably package these files. Then you will not have this problem. The replace option for the file type is NOT intended for what you are trying. Regards, Stefan. On Nov 29, 4:34 pm, Os wrote: > Hi, > > I am using puppet 2.6.2 and stepped over a situation, I cannot explain > to myself