Ah, ok. Program Data != Program Files. I use german Windows so I didn't
realize the difference right away.
Thanks for the quick response.
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 7:26:52 PM UTC+2, Josh Cooper wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Mike Sharpton > wrote:
>
>> Note sure if they c
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Mike Sharpton wrote:
> Note sure if they changed the path with 1.4.1. The path used to be what
> is below. May want to try that.
>
Just to confirm, we haven't changed the location of where puppet.conf goes.
>
> C:\programdata\PuppetLabs\puppet\etc
>
Yep that
Note sure if they changed the path with 1.4.1. The path used to be what is
below. May want to try that.
C:\programdata\PuppetLabs\puppet\etc
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 9:38:20 AM UTC-5, Mattis Haase wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we have been using puppet for unix machines for quite a while and it w
That worked, thanks a lot.
El viernes, 25 de mayo de 2012 16:49:30 UTC+2, Jeff McCune escribió:
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:43 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 25, 3:58 am, tiochan wrote:
>>
>> This stanza:
>>
>> > file { 'C:\\SOFTWARE\\7z920.msi':
>> > source => 'puppet://pup
As I can see, the best bet (and perhaps it would be a need) is having a
global respository accessible via netbios, NFS and HTTP for puppet, so
software is not needed to be transferred each time.
Thank you, John.
El viernes, 25 de mayo de 2012 14:43:40 UTC+2, jcbollinger escribió:
>
>
> On
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:43 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> On May 25, 3:58 am, tiochan wrote:
>
> This stanza:
>
> > file { 'C:\\SOFTWARE\\7z920.msi':
> > source => 'puppet://puppet.upc.edu/modules/windows/7z920.msi',
> > }
>
> tells Puppet that there is supposed to be a file C:\\SO
On May 25, 3:58 am, tiochan wrote:
This stanza:
> file { 'C:\\SOFTWARE\\7z920.msi':
> source => 'puppet://puppet.upc.edu/modules/windows/7z920.msi',
> }
tells Puppet that there is supposed to be a file C:\\SOFTWARE\
\7z920.msi on the system, and its content is supposed to exac
Hi Shawn,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Shawn Turpin wrote:
> Is this .MSI available (at least for testing)? When I click on the
> link it takes me to a login screen.
>
There should be a link to create a redmine account, which may be useful
later if you run into trouble and need to file a t
Is this .MSI available (at least for testing)? When I click on the
link it takes me to a login screen.
I am trying to pilot it in my test lab environment and would love to
give it a whirl. Especially since this testlab environment has
limited Internet connectivity (read that as none) so trying t
Hi Jay,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Jay Ze wrote:
> Thanks for your quick answer. What does "soon" mean? 1-2 weeks or
> within the next months?
>
I have a fix in my topic branch:
https://github.com/joshcooper/puppet/tree/ticket/2.7.x/11408-remote-recursionCan
you try it out and update the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Jay Ze wrote:
> Sorry. Wanted to know what shortly means.. not soon ;-)
>
Shortly means by the end of March with that caveat there is a small chance
it will not make it into the March release.
Hope this helps,
-Jeff
--
You received this message because you are
Sorry. Wanted to know what shortly means.. not soon ;-)
On 17 Feb., 07:32, Jay Ze wrote:
> On 16 Feb., 18:11, Josh Cooper wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi Jay,
>
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Jay Ze
> > wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I want to run Puppet on a Windows 2003 Server. I already ha
On 16 Feb., 18:11, Josh Cooper wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Jay Ze
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I want to run Puppet on a Windows 2003 Server. I already have a
> > working Puppetmaster (Scientific Linux).
>
> > I installed Puppet on Windows like shown here:
> >http://projec
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Arm Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I realize this thread is a little old but hoping someone can tell me
> if much progress has been made on getting Puppet running on Windows.
> I just tried to set up an agent according to the directions at
> http://projects.puppetlabs.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> On 26 November 2010 11:12, Thomas Bendler wrote:
>> 2010/11/26 Paul Nasrat
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> Joel did do a users/group provider which may be quite dated and need
>>> some porting - if you are happy to test/develop:
>>> https://github.com/fina
On 26 November 2010 11:12, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> 2010/11/26 Paul Nasrat
>>
>> [...]
>> Joel did do a users/group provider which may be quite dated and need
>> some porting - if you are happy to test/develop:
>> https://github.com/finalprefix/puppet/tree/win
>
> What is the procedure to use this
2010/11/26 Paul Nasrat
> [...]
> Joel did do a users/group provider which may be quite dated and need
> some porting - if you are happy to test/develop:
> https://github.com/finalprefix/puppet/tree/win
What is the procedure to use this version? Download the ZIP and run
install.rb or must be som
On 26 November 2010 09:21, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> 2010/11/25 Nigel Kersten
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:48 AM, thbe wrote:
>> [...]
>> > Any updates on this issue? Just set up puppet on a test box with a
>> > Windows 2003 R2 32 Bits and I get the same error.
>> We'll update the
Hi Nigel,
2010/11/25 Nigel Kersten
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:48 AM, thbe wrote:
> [...]
> > Any updates on this issue? Just set up puppet on a test box with a
> > Windows 2003 R2 32 Bits and I get the same error.
> We'll update the page for the alpha Windows support, but testing
> indicates w
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:48 AM, thbe wrote:
> On 28 Okt., 15:09, Kikanny wrote:
>> Hmmm...I've made some progress. There seemed to be some problems with
>> Ruby 1.9.1. So I reverted back to Ruby 1.8.7 and followed the steps
>> again as outlined
>> inhttp://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wik
On 28 Okt., 15:09, Kikanny wrote:
> Hmmm...I've made some progress. There seemed to be some problems with
> Ruby 1.9.1. So I reverted back to Ruby 1.8.7 and followed the steps
> again as outlined
> inhttp://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Puppet_Windows.
> Installed an additional gem call
I actually haven't tested that on x64. I just double checked in java
and that is correct. All file accesses work with forward slashes.
-Trevor
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:27 AM, barry.allard wrote:
> x64?
>
> On Oct 28, 8:37 am, Trevor Whitlock wrote:
>> Windows actually doesn't care about the
x64?
On Oct 28, 8:37 am, Trevor Whitlock wrote:
> Windows actually doesn't care about the direction of slashes in the
> path from programming languages.
>
> -Trevor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Kikanny wrote:
> > Hmm...that is what puppet reports when it is run. I think its b
Windows actually doesn't care about the direction of slashes in the
path from programming languages.
-Trevor
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Kikanny wrote:
> Hmm...that is what puppet reports when it is run. I think its because
> ruby accepts only forward slashes and since puppet is based on
>
On 10/28/2010 05:47 PM, Kikanny wrote:
> I'm thinking of giving upit looks like puppet for windows still
> tries to use the linux directory structure? Because there is a
> statement that says:
>
> debug: Puppet::Type::User::ProviderDirectoryService: file /usr/bin/
> dsc1 does not exist
>
>
I'm thinking of giving upit looks like puppet for windows still
tries to use the linux directory structure? Because there is a
statement that says:
debug: Puppet::Type::User::ProviderDirectoryService: file /usr/bin/
dsc1 does not exist
I don't know..I'm clueless. If anyone does get it working
Hmm...that is what puppet reports when it is run. I think its because
ruby accepts only forward slashes and since puppet is based on
rubycould make sense. Could be wrong though.
On Oct 28, 10:58 am, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
> Quoting Kikanny :
>
> > err: Could not request certificate
Quoting Kikanny :
err: Could not request certificate: Could not write C:/puppet/conf/ssl/
private_keys/testing.pem to privatekeydir: Could not find a default
provider for user
Exiting: failed to retrieve certificate and waitforcert is disabled.
I could be wrong, but shouldn't those slashes be b
Hmmm...I've made some progress. There seemed to be some problems with
Ruby 1.9.1. So I reverted back to Ruby 1.8.7 and followed the steps
again as outlined in
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Puppet_Windows.
Installed an additional gem called win32-security. This allowed the
puppet d
Paul Nasrat wrote:
> 2009/10/15 li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I notice from http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetWindows
>> that puppet will be able to run on windows as of 0.26.0.
>>
>> The document only really talks about managing users, are there plans to
>> expand t
2009/10/15 Steven Jenkins :
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> ...
>> I hope to mail the current patches to clean up core and a status
>> update to list on the weekend
>>
>
> Are there github repos that interested people could/should be tracking?
I need to push up tonight,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Paul Nasrat wrote:
...
> I hope to mail the current patches to clean up core and a status
> update to list on the weekend
>
Are there github repos that interested people could/should be tracking?
Thanks,
Steven
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
2009/10/15 li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk :
>
> Hi All,
>
> I notice from http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetWindows
> that puppet will be able to run on windows as of 0.26.0.
>
> The document only really talks about managing users, are there plans to
> expand this to other things, or ar
Hi
> I've just tried to install puppet 0.25rc1 (from source) on windows. I
> have three problems:
> * install.rb script tries to create files puppetca, puppetd, puppetqd,
> puppetrun in c:\ruby\sbin (no such dir in ruby installation) - small
> one :)
> * puppet cannot start - it tires to re
34 matches
Mail list logo
