Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-10 Thread Zach Leslie
Which isn't terrible, but you loose init scripts and the like. Zach On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:43 PM, bobics wrote: > I get around this issue by installing Puppet as a gem. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to thi

[Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-09 Thread bobics
I get around this issue by installing Puppet as a gem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@go

[Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-05 Thread Walter Heck
Hi Richard, On Nov 6, 12:59 am, Richard Crowley wrote: > You can't get around running an `apt-get update` but you can do that > from an exec resource in an earlier run stage. > > stage { pre: before => Stage["main"] } > exec { "apt-get update": stage => "pre" } > > You'll probably want to do your

[Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-05 Thread Walter Heck
Hi Patrick, On Nov 6, 1:25 am, Patrick wrote: > First, if you update puppet, it's probably a good idea to update facter. I thought that would be done by dependencies? If not, yes that is also what I need :) > Second, are you trying to use lenny-backports for everything or just puppet > and rela