On Mar 7, 2:37 am, Pablo Fernandez wrote:
> > On the other hand, I think your expectations are incorrect. It is
> > "enclosed" objects that are documented to also get tagged, and I would
> > not consider a node definition to be "enclosed by" another that
> > inherits from it.
>
> So, is there n
Hi,
> > So, the tags are not inherited. Each node prints the tag that is
> > declared in its own node, but not those from the parent or the
> > children. I have also tried to do manual tags, and they are not
> > inherited either.
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong, or is "tagging" not well docume
On Mar 6, 11:39 am, Pablo Fernandez wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have observed a behavior that doesn't seem (to me) to match the
> documentation. Specially, about tagging, the doc says:
>
> "
> Automatic Tagging
> All language statements enclosed in a node, define or class structure (read
> more abo
