Thanks. This one turned out to be user error. :)
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:08 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, August 27, 2012 5:39:36 PM UTC-5, Douglas wrote:
>>
>> Argh. I have the definition below. The gluster peer probe command has
>> already been executed successfully, and I'm testing
On Monday, August 27, 2012 5:39:36 PM UTC-5, Douglas wrote:
>
> Argh. I have the definition below. The gluster peer probe command has
> already been executed successfully, and I'm testing it with 'peer
> status'. Running the unless=> command yields:
>
> root@gfs01:~# /usr/sbin/gluster peer sta
