Can you publish your work on github. I might be able to help it along.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
jcbollinger wrote:
> Your problem is that you are conflating distinct (for your purposes)
> aspects of your resource's state. If you care at times whether the
> variable is declared at all or not, and at other times what its value
> is, then those should
On Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:28:13 AM UTC-5, dirk.he...@altum.de wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 13. März 2013 17:00:18 UTC+1 schrieb jcbollinger:
>
>>
>>
>> My problem now is that I don't know how to implement "ensure" for this
>>> case, as I cannot use "ensurable" in the type.
>>>
>>
>> Your problem
Am Mittwoch, 13. März 2013 17:00:18 UTC+1 schrieb jcbollinger:
>
>
> My problem now is that I don't know how to implement "ensure" for this
>> case, as I cannot use "ensurable" in the type.
>>
>
> Your problem is that you are conflating distinct (for your purposes)
> aspects of your resource's s
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 5:31:09 AM UTC-5, dirk.he...@altum.de wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently writing a custom type for managing Windows environment
> variables.
>
> A variable should be (re-)created if it doesn't exist or the value doesn't
> match the desired value. So exists? checks exa
