On Thursday, 21 June 2012 23:25:29 UTC+2, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:46:51 AM UTC-5, Kmbu wrote:
>>
>>
>> I've set up Apache/Passenger but I use it for Dashboard, not the
>> puppetmaster itself :-) Let me see if I can push my luck. Is there a quick
>> guide to movi
On 06/21/2012 04:40 PM, Jake - USPS wrote:
>
> This works for us although like I said I want to make it better, doing
> what you assumed I am doing ... shared storage. But since we can only
> make changes with a CHG ticket I basically make the update and then
> force a puppet run on my PMs (remot
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:46:51 AM UTC-5, Kmbu wrote:
>
>
> I've set up Apache/Passenger but I use it for Dashboard, not the
> puppetmaster itself :-) Let me see if I can push my luck. Is there a quick
> guide to moving Puppet to Passenger when Apache/Passenger are already in
> place?
>
A
On Thursday, 21 June 2012 15:54:59 UTC+2, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:52:21 AM UTC-5, Kmbu wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> I'm already running apache/passenger. Is there anything else I can do?
>>
>
> It is suspicious that you say you are using passenger, but the workload is
>
I'm going to admit I don't have the best setup here! :) There are things
I want to do to improve what I have now, just need to get room on the plate
to do it.
Right now my 'CA PM' is also a PM for the other PMs ... :-\ So my PMs that
are behind HAproxy have a puppet::master class assigned to
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:52:21 AM UTC-5, Kmbu wrote:
[...]
I'm already running apache/passenger. Is there anything else I can do?
>
It is suspicious that you say you are using passenger, but the workload is
not being spread over both CPUs. Make sure your clients are accessing the
pupp
Hi,
I see. So I assume your manifests are in NFS (or some other shared
storage) as well?
Is there anything else I should be wary of when putting my masters
behind HAproxy this way?
Thanks,
Felix
On 06/20/2012 06:45 PM, Jake - USPS wrote:
> As for doing an active/active the way I am, my haproxy l
Sorry ... I didn't really follow that link in my setup ... just thought it
would be a good reference as I don't have anything documented. Another
good thing to note is that article uses NGINX.
I'm cheating and am not FULLY redundant. We have a single CA PM that is
not balanced against or redu
On 06/20/2012 05:39 PM, Jake - USPS wrote:
> I'll add that we do loadbalance across multiple puppetmasters. At first
> we were using DNS round-robin to do it, and now use haproxy which a good
> article on utilizing was written up not too long
> ago http://blog.ronvalente.net/blog/2012/05/19/puppet
Check my reply in
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/puppet-users/USPS/puppet-users/q3bFvenGueI/hQExZ1X7pcwJ
I'll add that we do loadbalance across multiple puppetmasters. At first we
were using DNS round-robin to do it, and now use haproxy which a good
article on utilizi
Thanks for your support. Please find my responses below.
On Wednesday, 20 June 2012 15:18:17 UTC+2, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:35:39 AM UTC-5, Kmbu wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm running Puppet 2.7.6 and currently expanding the number of servers
>> managed by Puppet.
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:35:39 AM UTC-5, Kmbu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running Puppet 2.7.6 and currently expanding the number of servers
> managed by Puppet. At around the 160-170 host mark (with a 5-minute run
> interval + splay), my puppetmaster server is starting to die. Is this
> no
12 matches
Mail list logo
