Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-23 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Nick Fagerlund wrote: > On Jan 18, 4:06 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> That's definitely a bug. We moved to supporting lib/ in 0.25.x, we >> just must have missed making this work on the client side. > > Specifically, it looks like bug 4180 (http://projects.puppetlab

[Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-21 Thread Nick Fagerlund
On Jan 18, 4:06 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote: > That's definitely a bug. We moved to supporting lib/ in 0.25.x, we > just must have missed making this work on the client side. Specifically, it looks like bug 4180 (http://projects.puppetlabs.com/ issues/4180). This was never fixed in 0.25.x, right? Sho

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, windowsrefund wrote: > >> >> Looks like the mv lib plugins fix did not result in the fact loading. >> It seems to only be possible if I point FACTERLIB at the exact path. > > Sorry for the false positive. All is good with using plugins rather > than lib on 0.25.4

[Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread windowsrefund
> > Looks like the mv lib plugins fix did not result in the fact loading. > It seems to only be possible if I point FACTERLIB at the exact path. Sorry for the false positive. All is good with using plugins rather than lib on 0.25.4 Thanks again :) -- You received this message because you are s

[Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread windowsrefund
> > No, that covers it, actually.  Your problem is that the 0.25.4 series > consult only '.../ub2/plugins/facter/*.rb' for custom facts; the > '.../ub2/lib/facter/*.rb' version didn't come in until later.  (The > 2.6 AKA 0.26 series, IIRC, but I have not checked exactly when.) > Looks like the mv

[Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread windowsrefund
> Is your puppet master also an 0.25 series install, or are you using a > 2.6 master and 0.25 clients? Everything is 0.25.4 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. T

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 15:24, windowsrefund wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. The doc I referred to lives at > http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/plugins_in_modules.html Thanks. I will bug our tech writer in a moment. :) > I'll certainly try a mv lib plugins to see if it works as expected but

[Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread windowsrefund
Daniel, Thanks for the feedback. The doc I referred to lives at http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/plugins_in_modules.html I'll certainly try a mv lib plugins to see if it works as expected but I'm a little confused when I consider my existing source tree which does use the lib directory. Of cours

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 13:24, windowsrefund wrote: > Thanks for the assistance. I dropped a tarball over at > https://bitbucket.org/windowsrefund/temp/src/31bfb4826c7f/ub2.tar.gz > after extracting, I'd be able to reproduce the problem with: [...] > As for versions, here's what I'm doing: > >

[Puppet Users] Re: Behavior of local modules and their included facts

2011-01-18 Thread windowsrefund
Daniel, Thanks for the assistance. I dropped a tarball over at https://bitbucket.org/windowsrefund/temp/src/31bfb4826c7f/ub2.tar.gz after extracting, I'd be able to reproduce the problem with: cd ub2 puppet -d --modulepath=modules init.pp As for versions, here's what I'm doing: puppet 0.25.4 (