Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Augeas pam.d argument checking

2010-02-21 Thread Joe McDonagh
Nigel Kersten wrote: On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Joe McDonagh wrote: seph wrote: Joe McDonagh writes: I have not thought about using augeas because last time I tried to build it for our standard OS (Ubuntu 8.04) IIRC it needed a newer version of glibc. I didn't have any trouble buildi

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Augeas pam.d argument checking

2010-02-21 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Joe McDonagh wrote: > seph wrote: >> >> Joe McDonagh writes: >> >>> I have not thought about using augeas because last time I tried to >>> build it for our standard OS (Ubuntu 8.04) IIRC it needed a newer >>> version of glibc. >> >> I didn't have any trouble build

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Augeas pam.d argument checking

2010-02-21 Thread Joe McDonagh
seph wrote: Joe McDonagh writes: I have not thought about using augeas because last time I tried to build it for our standard OS (Ubuntu 8.04) IIRC it needed a newer version of glibc. I didn't have any trouble building the current ubuntu augeas packages for 8.04. I followed the pretty normal

[Puppet Users] Re: Augeas pam.d argument checking

2010-02-21 Thread seph
Joe McDonagh writes: > I have not thought about using augeas because last time I tried to > build it for our standard OS (Ubuntu 8.04) IIRC it needed a newer > version of glibc. I didn't have any trouble building the current ubuntu augeas packages for 8.04. I followed the pretty normal dpkg buil

[Puppet Users] Re: Augeas pam.d argument checking

2010-02-18 Thread Ed
So based on a posting from last year, I changed the definition to just remove and rebuild the line in pam.d/system-auth based on the variables passed in. Although this isn't the elegant solution that I was searching for (breaking it up to different functions and using "onlyif"), it does get the job