On Friday, May 17, 2013 12:35:24 AM UTC+10, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Stephen Gran
> > wrote:
> > Your push server can run git update and then rsync to the masters.
>
> Why rsync if you have git?
>
Martin, John, thanks for your feedback - it's very helpful.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Stephen Gran
wrote:
> Your push server can run git update and then rsync to the masters.
Why rsync if you have git?
You have
- the machine(s) where you edit and make commits on git, you then
_git push_ to what I'll call a "gold" git server
- the gold git serv
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:20:37 PM UTC-5, Alex Harvey wrote:
>
>
> I was actually thinking of doing something similar to what Stephen Gran
> suggested above; let rsync can take care of ensuring that all puppet
> masters always have the same copy of the same code tree. So in that
> situatio
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:48:22 AM UTC+10, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> If you want your masters to rely on a revision control system for
> manifests, data, or whatever, then it follows that the masters must be
> permitted to access that system. If they may not do so across network
> segments,
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:00:41 AM UTC-5, Alex Harvey wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:51:14 PM UTC+10, yersinia.spiros wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the top posting.
>>
>> Imho, i think this is a question that could be asked on the git mailing
>> list.
>>
>
> Sorry, my question apparen
On 15/05/13 07:00, Alex Harvey wrote:
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:51:14 PM UTC+10, yersinia.spiros wrote:
Sorry for the top posting.
Imho, i think this is a question that could be asked on the git
mailing list.
Sorry, my question apparently isn't clear enough - this definitely
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:51:14 PM UTC+10, yersinia.spiros wrote:
>
> Sorry for the top posting.
>
> Imho, i think this is a question that could be asked on the git mailing
> list.
>
Sorry, my question apparently isn't clear enough - this definitely isn't a
git question that can be answer
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:40:28 PM UTC+10, denmat wrote:
>
> I haven't worked out a pure git way but Jenkins, git export, rsync are a
> good solid combo :)
>
Do you know of any documentation or blog posts from others using a
configuration like this? My initial thinking was to use rsync bu
I haven't worked out a pure git way but Jenkins, git export, rsync are a good
solid combo :)
On 15/05/2013, at 14:51, devzero2000 wrote:
> Sorry for the top posting.
>
> Imho, i think this is a question that could be asked on the git mailing list.
>
> Best
>
> 2013/5/15, Alex Harvey :
>> Hi
Sorry for the top posting.
Imho, i think this is a question that could be asked on the git mailing list.
Best
2013/5/15, Alex Harvey :
> Hi all,
>
> In my company we have a security policy that frowns upon things like puppet
>
> masters making git pull requests to other network segments. Allowi
Hi all,
In my company we have a security policy that frowns upon things like puppet
masters making git pull requests to other network segments. Allowing code
to be pushed into these segments is less of a problem.
This policy makes it difficult to do stuff like,
https://puppetlabs.com/blog/git-
11 matches
Mail list logo