Re: [Puppet Users] Nested parametrized defines

2013-12-11 Thread Patricia Jung
Dear John and all, Am 18.11.2013 um 17:26 schrieb jcbollinger : > > Invalid resource type a::ssh_keys::add_to_ssh_authorized_keys at > /etc/puppet/modules/a/manifests/ssh_keys/:7" > > > "Invalid resource type" for a defined type, supposing that it's not > altogether a red herring, means tha

Re: [Puppet Users] Nested parametrized defines

2013-11-18 Thread jcbollinger
On Monday, November 18, 2013 3:40:46 AM UTC-6, Patricia Jung wrote: > > Dear John and all, > > Am 15.11.2013 um 15:47 schrieb jcbollinger: > > > > On Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:32:50 AM UTC-6, Patricia Jung wrote: > > > > http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/3/reference/lang_defined_types.ht

Re: [Puppet Users] Nested parametrized defines

2013-11-18 Thread Patricia Jung
Dear John and all, Am 15.11.2013 um 15:47 schrieb jcbollinger : > > On Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:32:50 AM UTC-6, Patricia Jung wrote: > > http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/3/reference/lang_defined_types.html does > not suggest to me that nested parametrized defines would be forbidden > >

Re: [Puppet Users] Nested parametrized defines

2013-11-14 Thread Henrik Lindberg
On 2013-14-11 12:32, Patricia Jung wrote: Dear puppet wizards, http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/3/reference/lang_defined_types.html does not suggest to me that nested parametrized defines would be forbidden, hence I expected the following code to work: add_to_ssh_authorized_keys.pp:

[Puppet Users] Nested parametrized defines

2013-11-14 Thread Patricia Jung
Dear puppet wizards, http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/3/reference/lang_defined_types.html does not suggest to me that nested parametrized defines would be forbidden, hence I expected the following code to work: add_to_ssh_authorized_keys.pp: define a::ssh_keys::add_to_ssh_authorized_k