On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Thomas Bellman wrote:
> >in my case I want each package to explicitly depend on its predecessor
> >in the array.
>
> How about this:
Thank you! I would eventually have written something involving
two defines calling eack other, with inline_template to munge the
arguments, bu
On 2010-06-16 19:21, Alan Barrett wrote:
No, that won't install the packages in any specific order. There are no
explicit or implicit dependencies between apckages in your example, but
in my case I want each package to explicitly depend on its predecessor
in the array.
How about this:
de
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Roy Nielsen wrote:
> I've got a file resource that makes sure a specific directory tree
> is created..
>
> $dirs = ["/var", "/var/lanl", "/var/lanl/puppet"]
>
> @file { $dirs :
> ensure => directory,
> owner => "root",
> group => "wheel",
> mode => 755
Hello Alan,
I've got a file resource that makes sure a specific directory tree is
created..
$dirs = ["/var", "/var/lanl", "/var/lanl/puppet"]
@file { $dirs :
ensure => directory,
owner => "root",
group => "wheel",
mode => 755,
links => follow,
}
I would think th
I have some software with a list of patches that need to be installed in
order. Different hosts want different patches (e.g. development hosts
get patches that are not yet ready for production).
Obviously I can do this:
package { "basepackage":
ensure => present,
}
package {
