Re: [Puppet Users] Facter 3.1 gem

2015-10-22 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Mickaël Canévet wrote: > What will happen when puppet (5?) will require facter 3+? > Will puppet still be available on rubygems.org or only within AIO > packages? > This would be very annoying for puppet module development... > There is one small improvement comi

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter 3.1 gem

2015-10-20 Thread Mickaël Canévet
What will happen when puppet (5?) will require facter 3+? Will puppet still be available on rubygems.org or only within AIO packages? This would be very annoying for puppet module development... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter 3.1 gem

2015-10-19 Thread seincin
Hey thank you for your response. Is the ruby 2.4 version of facter still sufficient for the latest puppet version? Will it continue to be? Will further development go into ruby facter or only in the compiled C++ version of facter? Thanks again. On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 1:52:37 PM UTC

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter 3.1 gem

2015-10-19 Thread Branan Riley
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:02 AM seincin wrote: > Curious why there has not been a Facter 3.X gem made available? > Facter 3 is written in C++ and relies on a VERY modern version of GCC, as well as new versions of a number of libraries. These are not available on most of the platforms Puppet supp

[Puppet Users] Facter 3.1 gem

2015-10-19 Thread seincin
Curious why there has not been a Facter 3.X gem made available? Any timeline on a release? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email t