On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:57:13 AM UTC-5, Jones wrote:
>
> If it's default it should use the puppet version... but if someone changed
> it puppet should do nothing.
> That's the little issue :/
>
It sounds like you want Puppet to manage the file content under some
circumstances, but not u
On 29/08/12 16:57, Johannes Reichhardt wrote:
If it's default it should use the puppet version... but if someone
changed it puppet should do nothing.
That's the wrong approach. if you are managing a resource through
puppet, then ALL changes go through puppet, otherwise it's a mess, and
then pup
If it's default it should use the puppet version... but if someone changed
it puppet should do nothing.
That's the little issue :/
Am 29.08.2012 16:21 schrieb "Davide Ferrari" :
>
> On 29/08/12 15:10, Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'd like to say puppet.
>> If the standart config file, delivered by dpkg, i
On 29/08/12 15:10, Jones wrote:
I'd like to say puppet.
If the standart config file, delivered by dpkg, is changed and has
also not the same md5sum as
the file I want to deliver with puppet. Do nothing :)
OK guys.. that was not my idea! I say everything has to be changed in
puppet and not by
Hi folks,
I'd like to say puppet.
If the standart config file, delivered by dpkg, is changed and has also not
the same md5sum as
the file I want to deliver with puppet. Do nothing :)
OK guys.. that was not my idea! I say everything has to be changed in
puppet and not by hand.
Or Maybe there i
