Re: [Puppet Users] Bug or Feature

2011-07-05 Thread Craig White
On Jul 4, 2011, at 5:45 AM, Felix Frank wrote: > On 07/01/2011 08:41 PM, Craig White wrote: >> Moving it to templates and appending .erb to the names handled things fine > > I think that's gratuitous. > > You can use templates without .erb names. Also, the file() function > would be more appro

Re: [Puppet Users] Bug or Feature

2011-07-04 Thread Felix Frank
On 07/01/2011 08:41 PM, Craig White wrote: > Moving it to templates and appending .erb to the names handled things fine I think that's gratuitous. You can use templates without .erb names. Also, the file() function would be more appropriate given the circumstances. Of course, the "right way" is

Re: [Puppet Users] Bug or Feature

2011-07-04 Thread Stefan Schulte
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:41:17AM -0700, Craig White wrote: > I had a number of symbolic links for file resources and didn't consider the > impact. > > source => "puppet:///modules/$some_module/some_file_which_is_a_symbolic_link" > > would actually transfer the link and not the content of the s

[Puppet Users] Bug or Feature

2011-07-01 Thread Craig White
I had a number of symbolic links for file resources and didn't consider the impact. source => "puppet:///modules/$some_module/some_file_which_is_a_symbolic_link" would actually transfer the link and not the content of the source link. Moving it to templates and appending .erb to the names handl