Re: [Puppet Users] Better solution for puppet SVN releases

2011-10-18 Thread Paul Morgan
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:52:18AM -0700, Andreas Paul wrote: > we are currently managing our puppet modules with one SVN workspace for each > admin. > The post commit hook script updates /etc/puppet/ directory and triggers the > puppet kick of the correct server. we use git branches. the master

Re: [Puppet Users] Better solution for puppet SVN releases

2011-10-18 Thread Christopher Wood
I use two separate puppetmasters for lab and production. (The lab side has more of the "dratted commas" style of checkin.) Testing changes to one particular type of server is where virtualization really shines. You can spin up a scratch virtual machine with the same manifests as your target hos

Re: [Puppet Users] Better solution for puppet SVN releases

2011-10-18 Thread Alexandre Fouché
I had a similar problem, i use Git, and i though i could use branches and Git tricks, but it does not mixes well with Puppet environments. What i do below permits to use many puppet code branches, while having my puppetmaster serve all different branches at the same time using environments In my c

[Puppet Users] Better solution for puppet SVN releases

2011-10-18 Thread Andreas Paul
Hi, we are currently managing our puppet modules with one SVN workspace for each admin. The post commit hook script updates /etc/puppet/ directory and triggers the puppet kick of the correct server. The problem we have with this solution is that sometimes there are many small checkins to one c