On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Mitchell Hashimoto <
mitchell.hashim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jeff McCune wrote:
>
>>
>> In Telly (Puppet 3.0.0), we support plugins distributed as rubygems, so
>> `require "foo/bar"` will work in this scenario, but only if the plugi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jeff McCune wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Mitchell Hashimoto <
> mitchell.hashim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks! This looks like basically what I was planning on doing, so it is
>> good to see that this works.
>>
>
> I'm glad.
>
>
>> Can you expand
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Mitchell Hashimoto <
mitchell.hashim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks! This looks like basically what I was planning on doing, so it is
> good to see that this works.
>
I'm glad.
> Can you expand on how #4248 is worked around by your pull?
>
Sure, the issue is th
Jeff,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jeff McCune wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Mitchell Hashimoto <
> mitchell.hashim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to DRY up some of my Puppet lib code and wanted to put helper
>> classes in other parts of the "lib/" folder in my plu
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Mitchell Hashimoto <
mitchell.hashim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to DRY up some of my Puppet lib code and wanted to put helper
> classes in other parts of the "lib/" folder in my plugin.
>
There are a couple of issues that prevent require from simply w
Hi,
I'd like to DRY up some of my Puppet lib code and wanted to put helper
classes in other parts of the "lib/" folder in my plugin.
What is the best way to access these files? I can think of various ways
that may be considered hacks but wanted to know if there was a preferred
way.
Best,
Mitchel
