Re: [Puppet Users] 2.7.2 or higher repository for Ubuntu 10.04

2011-10-20 Thread Scott Smith
Use fpm. On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Dan Sheffner wrote: > *ruby 1.9.2 not puppet 1.9.2 > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Dan Sheffner wrote: > >> I'm compiling from source w/ rvm, and puppet 1.9.2, then installing puppet >> through gems. I might be able to publish my python script t

Re: [Puppet Users] 2.7.2 or higher repository for Ubuntu 10.04

2011-10-20 Thread Dan Sheffner
*ruby 1.9.2 not puppet 1.9.2 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Dan Sheffner wrote: > I'm compiling from source w/ rvm, and puppet 1.9.2, then installing puppet > through gems. I might be able to publish my python script that does this. > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Evan Stachowiak < > e

Re: [Puppet Users] 2.7.2 or higher repository for Ubuntu 10.04

2011-10-20 Thread Dan Sheffner
I'm compiling from source w/ rvm, and puppet 1.9.2, then installing puppet through gems. I might be able to publish my python script that does this. On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Evan Stachowiak wrote: > Is there a best practice or repository I can pull from to install > >=2.7.2 on ubuntu 10.

[Puppet Users] 2.7.2 or higher repository for Ubuntu 10.04

2011-10-20 Thread Evan Stachowiak
Is there a best practice or repository I can pull from to install >=2.7.2 on ubuntu 10.04? I'm currently using backports and the latest available version is 2.7.1, which is below the requirements for cloud provisioner. Or should I just go ahead and compile from source? -- You received this messa