On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
>
> Being lazy and forgetful a while ago I wrote a small bash shell script that
> checks puppet manifests and ruby code embedded in templates.
>
> I'm posting it to the group in hope that others will find it useful and
> suggest improvement
Il 22/dic/2013 00:46 "Felix Frank" ha
scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> signing a new master certificate should not be an issue, as long as it's
> signed using the same CA certificate as the old one (i.e., a CA that is
> trusted by all clients).
>
> When the CA certificate expires, it should be quite possible
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Stuart Cracraft wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some books on Puppet, none of which impresses me.
>
> What are the Puppet books you have and why do you think they are good.
>
Also puppet 3 cookbook is nice http://www.packtpub.com/puppet-3-cookbook/book
--
You received
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:41 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:31:10 PM UTC-5, François Chenais wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I got many classes, using the well known template ...
>>
>> package
>> ensure => XXX
>> notify => service
>>
>> file
>> require =
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First off... is these some pun I'm not getting, or was it supposed to
> be "Holy Grail"? Just wondering :-)
>
> Also, when I read "Puppet Modules Standard naming conventions", I
> thought it was just about module names, but it seems
Sorry for the top posting.
Imho, i think this is a question that could be asked on the git mailing list.
Best
2013/5/15, Alex Harvey :
> Hi all,
>
> In my company we have a security policy that frowns upon things like puppet
>
> masters making git pull requests to other network segments. Allowi
Sorry for the top posting.
Perhaps are you searching for something like puppy by example42 ? Give
it a look.
Best
2012/12/2, Dhaval :
> Hi,
>
> using puppet can i manage application packages, for example if some
> application user want to install his application package, is it possible to
>
> ma
Sorry for the top posting.
So, configuration and package management are different problem: trying
to solve a problem with a tool born for solving the other problem can
have, in the short or long run, some issue.
Ymmv, as everyone else.
Best
2012/11/6, Alan Evans :
> Budicom,
>
> One thing I mig
Everyone had ever used the puppet forge know this. The forge today are
collection of modules, with a different degree of quality. But this
quality is not enforced by a external authority, there is not any
review. Think about it : it is a forge. Like sf.net for some open
source software, some projec
Well, in many enterprise distro having different name and, possibly,
no conflicting path for a complex package is a common option. In
rhel5 for example exists samba package for samba 3.0.x and samba3x for
samba 3.x , and samba it is often a critical package and the change
between different versión
For situation like this define the group as a virtual group , better
yet define a module that contain the virtual group including it in
your class and "realize" it when necessary. Or sometime better use the
"spaceship" operator if you want to realize with a command multiple
user resources, virtual
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Eric Shamow wrote:
> First off, it's important to distinguish import from include. They "feel"
> like similar concepts but they're not - import goes and physically loads a
> file. Include says "ensure that this class is part of this host's resource
> graph."
>
It
Sorry for the top posting.
Unless someone want consider that a configuration management system is
also an integrity checker, i no for example, i suggest to use for this
sort of thing a specific tool. There are many, also sophisticated. A
very simple tool is aide, for example, or tripwire.
Best re
Sorry for the top posting.
If you look carefully you should find that this year red hat extend
the 5 and 6 lifetime to 10 year, without extended maintenance support.
But i agree that rhel 5 is not the best plattform for running foreman
or dashboard.
Regards
2012/1/6, Michael Stahnke :
> Jo, than
Are you sure that exposing a password hash by a fact is a sane thing
to do from a security point of view ? Too simple to mont a dictionary
attack, isn't ?
2012/7/22, bg :
> This is a bit of a leading question, but is there a limitation as far as
> length/size of facts on a node?
>
> I have a need
Linkedin is a good place
2012/5/30, Steve Traylen :
> On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 22:49:44 UTC+2, Michael Stanhke wrote:
>>
>> How do folks feel about getting Puppet job listings on this list?
>> I've rejected a few that we quite spammy, but when the subject matter
>> really is a system admin with p
Sorry for the top posting.
Imnsho, rpm had always permitted to have multiple package version if
they not conflict, in fact the usual case is the kernel. Anyway your
question is most rpm related: so if you like i suggest you to ask to a
rpm mailing list.
Best regards
2012/5/27, Anthony Shortland
Just for being sure. Do you have selinux in enforcing mode ? What tell
you the sestatus command ? And ausearch -m avc ? Regards
2011/9/2, Chris Doherty :
> Hi, all. I'm having a problem that I'm virtually certain is a perms
> issue, but I can't figure out where it's going wrong.
>
> The puppetmas
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I encountered a following problem, if I state for example:
>
> package{"aspell-en": ensure => absent, }
> package{"aspell":ensure => absent, }
>
> I get error in logs because of dependencies. It seems that puppet uses
> 'yum' for
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Joseph Griffiths wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am pretty new to puppet and struggle with the syntax any help with
> this problem means a lot... I am trying to install an RPM on a RHEL
> system via puppet on the command line it works great. Here is the
> section of c
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:22 PM, ScubaDude wrote:
> Can someone point me in the right direction, I've got two "source"
> files one 32bit, on 64bit
Probably more elegant to use a ERB template only
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
21 matches
Mail list logo
