Re: [Puppet Users] Help with bind option for mount

2012-06-22 Thread cnjohnson
On Friday, June 22, 2012 11:20:45 AM UTC-5, Stefan Schulte wrote: > > So I guess what you really want is > > mount { '/chroot/centos5/home': > ensure => mounted, > device => '/gpfs20/home', > fstype => 'none', > options => 'rw,bind', > } > > As you can se

[Puppet Users] Help with bind option for mount

2012-06-22 Thread cnjohnson
This is my first foray into using puppet for creating and maintaining bind mounts (see man 8 mount). I am unsure of how to describe the state I want puppet to achieve. This is for creating files systems in a chroot jail. I am primarily unsure of how to set the "options". Is it a string, and arra

[Puppet Users] RESOLVED: puppet 0.25.4 & passenger with 0.24.8 clients

2010-03-31 Thread cnjohnson
My thanks to Daniel Pittman and Nigel Kersten for their help. They helped put me on the right track to solving the problem. I had the problem of upgrading a puppet server from 0.24.8 to 0.25.4. Subsequently, classes were not imposed on the clients. There were no error messages either on the client

[Puppet Users] puppet 0.25.4 & passenger with 0.24.8 clients

2010-03-30 Thread cnjohnson
Today has not been a good day! :) I made a small change in /modules/motd/files to see if it would be propagated to 1 client (of ~850) I am testing with. Previously my puppetmasterd and clients were both at 0.24.8. Everything worked swimmingly. Now, even though the client and server "communicate"

[Puppet Users] puppet 0.25.4 & passenger

2010-03-30 Thread cnjohnson
If I run puppetmasterd alone I can connect to an 0.24.x client. However, if I use passenger (2.2.11) and apache I get the following error in my apache error_log: Could not prepare for execution: Got 1 failure(s) while initializing: change from absent to file failed: Could not set file on ensure: P

[Puppet Users] Tidy question

2009-09-04 Thread cnjohnson
I have the following in site.pp tidy { "/usr/spool/PBS/aux": age => '26w', } expecting that all files 26 weeks or older would be gone in /usr/spool/ PBS/aux Doesn't happen. What am I missing? Cheers-- Charles --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this

[Puppet Users] Another puppet data point

2009-09-03 Thread cnjohnson
About week ago, we moved our production puppet server to an older IBM OpenPower Server with 8 cores and 8GB ram. We use Ubuntu 8.04 LTS for the PowerPC (the most recent version for this hardware). We have puppet 0.24.8, Apache+ssl, Passenger 2.2.2 and Rack 1.0. We manage 780 identically configure

[Puppet Users] Information: Puppet server

2009-08-24 Thread cnjohnson
Later this week, we will be moving our puppet server to an ancient IBM PowerPC 970FX (akin to the Mac G5 server) with 8 cores and 16GB RAM. It will run ubuntu-server, apache+ss, passenger and puppet. However, at the moment our server is an IBM HS20, x86_64, with 4 cores and 1GB of RAM. It is hand

[Puppet Users] Puppet server recommendations

2009-08-19 Thread cnjohnson
I have deployed puppet on our test cluster -- 20 identically configured x86_64 and ppc64 compute nodes and their gateways. I now want to move to our production cluster with (say) 800 compute nodes and their gateways. My question is about the puppet server box itself. I am using apache+ssl with pas

[Puppet Users] Re: puppet logging with passenger

2009-08-07 Thread cnjohnson
On Aug 7, 12:50 am, David Schmitt wrote: > cnjohnson wrote: > > I am running puppet-0.24.8 with passenger-2.2.2, apache-2.2.3 on RHEL > > 5.2. I have two nodes, one x86_64 and one ppc64, that have the client > > running and they are checking in regularly as expected. I have

[Puppet Users] puppet logging with passenger

2009-08-06 Thread cnjohnson
I am running puppet-0.24.8 with passenger-2.2.2, apache-2.2.3 on RHEL 5.2. I have two nodes, one x86_64 and one ppc64, that have the client running and they are checking in regularly as expected. I have a minimal site.pp file which defines the owner, group and permissions on several files. Changes