Thank you so much man. Your post saved a lot of my time.
On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 8:53:39 PM UTC+5:30, Luke Bigum wrote:
>
> Not sure if people are already aware of this, but it might save
> someone some time in the future. I've been tracking down the following
> error today, it's rathe
r...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
--
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppe
rtificates would have
changed.
BTW, I am using puppet to manage about 700+ hosts, I am beginning to worry
about the scenario as mentioned above. I definitely don't want to login to
each host to clear the "ssl" directory to make it request new certificate.
Thanks,
--
LOhit
--
You rece
the impression that the exclusive node definition takes
precedence over regex matches, but guess I was wrong.
-LOhit
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Brice Figureau <
brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:05 +0530, LOhit wrote:
> > Hi,
&g
Thanks, in fact, I was going to use that if nothing else worked. It would be
nice to have a exclude list though.
Best Regards,
-LOhit
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM, christian wrote:
> If you don't want to edit your regexp, a simple solution could be
> adding something like
wever, I have 2 hosts in this list which
have to be excluded. But, I don't know how to do that.
Can anyone please provide some pointers/ tips to fix this?
Thanks in advance.
--
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users"
Simple answer, don't do it. :)
Do yourself a favour and upgrade the server first. Older versioned clients
can connect to a server running newer version.
-LOhit
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:41 PM, sdotsen wrote:
> I'm using the latest stable build of 0.24 on my servers. The
> pupp
Hi,
Sure, we can take it up on the irc channel. However, just for the record,
sudo permission is fine, it was a working setup prior to upgrade. And the
user the foreman runs as, can execute "puppetca", I tested it from the
command line to make sure.
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Mon, Ma
g, I even tried changing the lines back to pre 0.1-4
version, but to no avail.
Best regards,
*-LOhit
*
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> :)
>
> Lets start with feature requests for anything in your wishlist
> Ohad
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:09 PM, L
Ahhh!!! I thought those files would be generated automatically. One more
item added to my foreman wishlist. :)
Please let me know if I can contribute in any way.
-LOhit
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thats correct, but you still need to generate t
Hi,
Yes, I did. And this is what I understand,
1) Clicking the "Build" button creates a pxe config file in the directory
specified in "settings.yaml"
2) After the machine is rebuilt, this file/link is removed.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Mon,
wever, the symlink points to a non-existent destination in the same
directory. Example.
*lrwxrwxrwx 1 puppet puppet 15 Feb 22 11:15 01-00-1b-78-32-44-90 ->
RedHat-4-x86_64*
Any help?
Regards,
-LOhit
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:26 PM, LOhit wrote:
> Hi Ohad, You are a genius..!!! I owe yo
positories/entry/foreman/vendor/plugins/proxy/lib/proxy.rb#L80
>
> which basically tests if the ca directory is available and puppetca can be
> found.
> I'm guessing one of these two are missing (or in a non standard location).
>
> cheers,
> Ohad
>
>
>
>
for puppet
> binaries ?
>
> Ohad
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Foreman needs to be able to execute puppetca, see
>> http://theforeman.org/repositories/entry/foreman/extras/puppet/foreman/manifests/puppetca.pp
>&
rror in the web interface indicating that the
installation failed. Any ideas?
*"PuppetCA: SSL/CA or puppetca unavailable on this machine"*
*"Failed to enable hostname_here for installation"*
Thanks in advance.
--
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
any mistakes. I am
willing to learn.
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:37 PM, LOhit wrote:
> Yes, of course. Let's see how I fare. :)
>
> Thanks
> LOhit
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>
>> http://theforeman.org/issues/show/1
Yes, of course. Let's see how I fare. :)
Thanks
LOhit
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> http://theforeman.org/issues/show/135
>
> hopefully its a starting point
>
> cheers,
> Ohad
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:03 PM, LOhit wrote:
>
>
be from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
--
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppe
day to day tasks.
However, I would definitely try and see if I can contribute in any way to
add this feature. Hmm, need to learn ruby first :)
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:12 PM, LOhit wrote:
>
>> Hello,
sed to get nice
tabulated summary email of the output of my custom script(basically a log
parser).
Best regards,
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
Thanks Ohad for the quick reply. I think I'll wait for "0.1-4".
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Its on my todo list - see http://theforeman.org/issues/show/124 - it has
> some workarounds in that ticket until I&#x
7200) from the
current 30 minutes?
Thanks,
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr
Hi Silviu,
Well, that did the magic. :) Thanks a bunch.
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Silviu Paragina wrote:
> On 09.12.2009 12:35, LOhit wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am facing a little problem(?) with foreman. I have enabled
> > "report
rom fedora project's EPEL repository.
OS is RHEL5.
Thanks in advance.
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
Just an update.
I could get foreman and external nodes config working. It is much more fun
now. I am planning to enable RRDgraph reports and much more. Will keep you
guys posted.
Thanks much,
-Bob
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, LOhit wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for the
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
--
LOhit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
26 matches
Mail list logo
